Pride and Prejudice
discussion
Do you find similarities between Jane Eyre and Elizabeth Bennet?
date
newest »


I would say both Elizabeth and Jane are independent, but Jane is more independent than Lizzy. Jane has virtually no family at all; Elizabeth does. Jane finds her own job; Lizzy never has one. Jane tries to become her own woman, temporarily leaving Rochester and only returning once she has her own fortune; that never happens with Elizabeth.
Charlotte Brontë probably jealous of Jane Austen. However, I think that Brontë, as a feminist, probably thought Jane Austen created characters that were too weak, too conventional, and too privileged to be interesting.


Elizabeth wasn't so conventional, she spoke her mind, criticized others, turned down Mr. Collins and Mr. Darcy. Wasn't it expected of women to accept proposals of marriage?
I love Charlotte Bronte, but I'm amazed she missed so many things about Jane Austen, I wonder if it was on purpose. I know she loved Byron and Shakespeare, so I guess the world of Jane Austen might have seemed dull to her.

Elizabeth is "romantic" enough to desire to marry for love but at her core, she's a practical person.I think of her as kind of the "calm in the storm," someone who regulates her personal feelings carefully and often chooses to laugh instead of cry.
Conversely, Jane is entirely governed by her emotions. It's what landed her in so much trouble as a child, and it continues into her adulthood. After her disastrous attempt to marry Rochester, she runs off in the night and ends up begging on the streets, almost dying because she can't stand to stay in that house another minute. Lizzie Bennet would have never done that.
Jane and Elizabeth are both strong-willed female leads, but they show that in very different ways and I think they're two very different characters.

Otherwise their personalities were quite different. Elizabeth is confident, lively, humorous, and very sociable-- Jane Eyre has really none of these qualities; she smolders with an intensity that she habitually tries to mask, rarely expresses her feelings, and takes little interest in the society of other people. Elizabeth seems to view life with affection even if with a pervasive strain of sarcasm-- Jane Eyre seems to view life as a battle, within which one must either cope or conquer, and in which the unhappy or insupportable is ever trailing only a step or two behind.
A part of Charlotte Bronte's vitriol for Jane Austen probably had to do with the way in which she was introduced to Jane Austen's work: by a literary critic who had recommended 'P&P' to Charlotte Bronte as an example of how to make improvements in her own writing. That is quite an obnoxious 'recommendation'; and Charlotte Bronte was not a person to respond graciously to felt affronts when vehemence offered a truer vehicle for her feelings. Every bit as intense as Jane Eyre, it probably felt like another battle front: she felt attacked, and responded aggressively with her own salvos.
At the same time, Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte seem as different in personality as Elizabeth Bennett and Jane Eyre. I read a description somewhere that the two writers reflected a clash between the arch-classicist and arch-romantic: Jane Austen focused primarily on clever and elegant mental activity; Charlotte Bronte on intense and passionate feeling.
I doubt that Charlotte Bronte would have admired Jane Austen's writing even had she not been introduced to it so obnoxious a fashion. One wonders, though, whether she would have been so acerbic in disparaging Jane Austen, not only as a writer but even as a woman and person, which itself was quite obnoxious considering she knew not the first thing about the dead writer upon whom she lavished such personalized scorn.

Very well put. I agree completely.


That makes a lot of sense, I think and would definitely explain Charlotte Bronte's distaste for Austen's work. Personally I think there is another similarity between the two, that of pride. Because all though it is Mr Darcy which is said to be the character that the pride part of the title refers to, Lizzie is proud as well. And Jane was proud enough to eat out of a pigs trough rather than ask for charity.

It's seems a good point, because Elizabeth definitely prided herself on her discernment and penetration, even though these qualities failed her concerning both Wickham and Mr. Darcy. Plus, her pride was 'mortified', as she herself said, by Mr. Darcy originally finding her only 'tolerable' rather than pretty. She had some certain amount of pride in both her looks and her judgment.
And as you mentioned, Jane Eyre had strains of pride almost amounting to recklessness, unwilling to ask for charity even if it meant dying from the hunger or cold of homelessness.

Maybe they both did despise her writing, but they were intrigued by her nonetheless. I bet Charlotte went back many times and reread her, to find something she may have missed.


Jane's flight from Rochester is the reason I admire her so much. It was a sinful situation, so she had to get out fast, no matter the cost. Lizzy didn't face any such challenge. Her going to work as a governess was never even considered a viable option, though if her father had died before she married, she might have had to.


I have to agree with you Marte. My sense is that Charlotte Bronte felt driven to break the bounds of conventional storytelling, frustrated with social constraints that she felt were oppressive and unhealthy, and determined to make a resounding statement in favor of direct emotional authenticity regardless of social censure. Jane Austen must have seemed to her the antithesis of this latter intention: much if not most of the emotional intensities in her work are expressed indirectly; she works within the framework of the social conventions even as she satirizes them, etc.
All to say that I wouldn't assume any jealousy on Charlotte Bronte's part either. She seemed to have something like a 'warrior spirit': she had a mission and charged headlong into it, with little patience or interest for those not alongside her. Or something like that; I think her lack of appreciation for Jane Austen's work was honest.

http://wwnorton.tumblr.com/post/18161...


I do! I think they both have a sense of humour and a caustic take on the world, & they both hate snobbery. I think they'd get on very well.

I think that Austen focuses more on Elizabeth´s pride and prejudice than on Darcy´s, and I think she tries to prove that a woman becomes stronger when she acknoledges her imperfections, therefore she is able to be objective. Austen understands that self-pity isn´t the way to self-improvement, but Bronté turns to drama in order to show Jane´s self-sufficience. Jane Eyre becomes independent when she inherits her uncle´s fortune and Elizabeth obtains her independence by marrying Darcy. Jane finally obtains a better life because of her kinship with a wealthy man, and Elizabeth because her inteligence makes a wealthy man fall in love with her and when she also falls in love with him, she accept to marry him. A smart choise, I would say.
To sum-up, I consider Austen stronger and smarter than Bronté, because she doesn´t write under prejudice. Her own circumstance as a woman doesn´t affect her writing. She dyes as an author, when her writing begins, as Barthes would say.

She deals with life as it is, as it is imposed upon her. And if someone as cluey, strong and wilful as Elizabeth Bennet couldn't get a job and make her way in the world, then who could?
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Was it jealousy because of Austen's reputation? Or perhaps she just didn't like how Austen wrote, apparently Austen wasn't "poetic" enough for her.