The Light Between Oceans
discussion
discussion
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Josée Leon
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 04, 2013 05:51AM

reply
|
flag









I was disappointed to find there were no more books by M.L. Stedman to read!

Loved this book very very much ! The ending tho

But, it is too bad that they couldn't just have asked around, saying, well, if no one wants her, we'll take her.

In a perfect world, of course Isabel should have returned Lucy to Hannah when the truth was made known. However, we don't live in a perfect world with perfect people making perfect decisions all the time. How lackluster the novel would have been if it had ended with Isabel willingly giving Lucy back to her birth mother. I doubt that ending would have generated many reader discussions.

When Isabel marries Tom, she is an emotional and, at times, impetuous young woman. Add years of loneliness on the island and the despair and sadness of losing three babies, it becomes understandable why she made so many bad decisions involving a baby miraculously washed up on shore.
All this, and what felt like betrayal by Tom, made Isabel's choice to choose to tell the truth about Tom and give up Lucy a very poignant moment in the novel.


..."
Thank-you so much for sharing your personal story. I think that people have been involved in adoption (in any of the roles) have a different and valuable perspective on this book.

Isobel did not adopt Lucy. Lucy was not given..."
Agreed.

But did anyone else catch that the title of the book could be symbolic and not the literal meaning of the lighthouse where the two oceans meet?
Think of the young girl (the baby that he found) as the light and the two "mothers" as the oceans. She is the light that keeps both mothers attention and love and brightens both of their worlds. The "oceans"/mothers are battling the whole time just like the literal oceans are battling one another at the peak of the island where the actual lighthouse is located.
If this was mentioned earlier (oops and forgive me). But this was my profound thought during our book club discussion that made everyone stop and say "wow, maybe"



No matter how much you want a child, you can't just take another person's child and pretend it's your own."
Exactly! Nobody seemed to be thinking what was best for the child; the adults' needs were first and foremost. One other thing that bothered me about this book was the fact that Tom had met Hannah before; the book lost a lot of credibility for me at that point. It seemed "soap opera'ish" to me. However, having said all the above, I think this would be a great story to talk about in my book group. Lots of interesting issues to discuss.

Stedman is a very good author. I am interested to read more of her works - whenever more become available. She knows how to keep her audience intrigued. Well done!!!

No matter how much you want a child, you can't just take another person's child and pretend it's your own."
It was pretty much this simple for me too. The are thousands of reviews of this book talking about the moral dilemma central to the plot. There was no dilemma in the book I read.

I was also waiting for the King Solomon moment... Some break in the child abduction/abuse where adults would come together or make a sacrifice and act in the interest of the child.


http://thislittlebooknook.weebly.com/

I was so hoping that Izzy and Tom would be able to reconcile after his confession. I was so relieved when Izzy came to the police station to set things right. That was one of my favorite scenes in the book. I loved the strong picture of marriage in this story as the characters ultimately decided to remain true to their vows for better or for worse. I feel like Izzy lost sight of the wonderful blessing she had been given in Tom as the strong desire to be a mother began to overshadow everything else.
The first half of the book was so sweet and full of beautiful descriptions. I could picture life on Janus with the smell of the wind blowing in your face off of the ocean. I loved Izzy and Tom's relationship as it first started and how she wanted to name all the different parts of the island. Then, the second half of the book was stressful and distressing as consequences to actions had to be dealt with. The end was so bittersweet. I loved that Tom and Izzy seemed to have rebuilt their life together, but I was sad that they were never able to share their lives with a child. Everyone's life in the story was shaped by sorrow.
I few points of criticism...There was way too much taking the Lord's name in vain for me. In my opinion, it isn't necessary and takes away from a great story. I also thought the way the verb tense changed around was distracting. I have noticed this trend in a few other books that have been written recently. I don't like that style; I feel like it breaks up the flow.
This story really made you think. I wanted to be able to talk about it with someone after I finished!

I was really glad that we met Lucy's character as an adult in the end of the novel, which she goes back with her offspring to meet that two people that saved her life.

That's how I saw it as well, although at first reading I found the book terribly sad and upsetting. After the discussion in my book club, I decided to reread the second half (basically from about the time Tom and Isabel realize Hannah is alive). Knowing the ending, and that Lucy, who was the one I was most concerned about, came through all right, I was able to read the really difficult parts without getting so upset.
True, the child didn't understand what was happening at first and missed Isabel terribly. But once she was older, I think Lucy would have appreciated that Hannah, who hadn't given her up willingly, fought so hard for her and cared so much about her. That kind of love is a rock for a person.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic