Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
This topic is about
George MacDonald
Policies & Practices
>
Combine redacted with original editions? Or separate?
date
newest »
newest »
Well, it depends on whether the "redactions" are abridgements, in which case the policy is to combine them with the originals, or adaptations, in which case we separate. To me it sounds like they're abridgements, if text has been removed but the remaining text has not actually been altered.
Phillips removed text, but he also condensed some portions and changed stuff like this: “Ye hae had mair to du wi’ me nor ye ken, an’ aiblins ye’ll hae mair nor yet ye can weel help. Sae caw canny, my man.”
“Ye may hae the layin’ o’ me oot,” said Malcolm, “but it sanna be wi my wull; an gien I hae ony life left I’ me, Is’ gie ye a fleg.”
“Ye may get a war yersel’: I hae frichtit the deid afore noo. Sae gang yer wa’s to Mistress Coorthoup, wi’ a flech i’ yer lug.”
into understandable English, with just a bit of Scottish flavor. Would that move it more into the category of "adaptation"?
Books mentioned in this topic
Malcolm (other topics)The Fisherman's Lady (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
George MacDonald (other topics)Michael R. Phillips (other topics)




Some of the entries for the redacted reprints are combined with the original editions here on Goodreads. In other cases, the redacted versions and the originals are separate. For example, Malcolm (original unedited version) and The Fisherman's Lady (redacted reprint) have separate entries. But the sequel The Marquis of Lossie (original) and The Marquis' Secret (redacted reprint) are combined: http://www.goodreads.com/work/edition...
The entries need to be made consistent, but my question is should the originals and their redactions all be combined, or all be separated? I know the Librarian Manual says to combine "different publications of the same book." But the redactions are significantly different from the originals, as noted above, so I'm not sure about combining. Input?