Horror Aficionados discussion
Horrorpedia
>
Ponderables in Horror
date
newest »


By the way I read this story over the summer and really liked it.


That's an idea I hadn't thought of. While Spanish wines tend to be some of my favorites, I tend not to care for Sherry, although I have been to the region and tried a few. I discussed the 'Amontillado' process with a vintner in the Hill Country who explained the 'processing differences' to me in a very general way. I'm more of a Rioja man (although I don't drink very often).


Are both the light and dark sherries you speak of fine'? As I said, I don't care much for Sherry (or Port, either), and have only a passing familiarity with them.

The original question that got it all started was a line from 'A Cask of Amontillado'. It has bothered me since the first time I read it. For those who haven't read it in a while, I'll post the relevant bits. Before the line in question, Montressor muses:
"In painting and gemmary, Fortunato, like his countrymen , was a quack - but in the matter of old wines he was sincere."
Yet just a bit later Fortunato says: "Luchesi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry."
Okay, there are three possibilities, one I discount completely:
1. Poe made a mistake (Neither I nor anyone else I've spoken to thinks this is likely, Poe was usually waaaaaay too meticulous).
2. Poe was trying to show Montressor's madness even further. (No one is buying this one either...but I think it is more probable than #1)
3. Poe was taking a jibe again. (this is the consensus so far)
The question is...Poe was in a heated (well, more than one...but especially one) war of words with another columnist. Why would he expose himself so openly? Anyone have any thoughts?