Annotated & Illustrated Edition, November 2012

[Martin]

Although this book is a novelty for being 'annotated' and 'illustrated', I am now finding it deeply disappointing for the very poor quality of the reproduction, i.e. in grey! This point is made effectively in the recent "New York Times" review: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/sci...
I find the omission of three pages from Francis Crick's letter of 13th April 1967 (pages 296 - 298) deeply irritating. Also where are the three press cuttings from "News Chronicle", "Varsity", and "New York Times" as they are not included unfortunately? Overall, it's a good read but could have been better.