The Power of Six
discussion
Why no movie??!!
message 51:
by
Barend
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Oct 20, 2013 02:34AM

reply
|
flag

The reason it flo..."
THANK YOU FOR NOT BEING BIASED ABOUT IT!!!! And I agree.

Exactly, thats what i said!


where did you read this?


http://ian4ph.wordpress.com/2013/05/0...

Lets compare this to some other film/book series......
Percy Jackson: Fans got so mad about the adaptation that there is now an online petition to get a cartoon remake of the series after the films gave a 'based on the series' a run for their money. They even missed out Pan. I know I've given up saying the book and the film are the same story.
Eragon: Put simply is a series of books where the director took his favourite parts from the series to create a film.
Really, our fandom is lucky to even get a film like what we got and making another film is highly unlikely. If the film didnt do as well as it needed to in the box office, they probably wont make another for a while. Ontop of this, I found that the film was adjusted to get masses of explosion and action in as they could; they were trying to appeal to their target audience. Do you really want them to make another film if they do that instead of trying to please the fans?.





You obviously didn't watch the Percy Jackson movies

By flop, I meant failure. Obviously they failed if there is no sequel. yes flop means when they have negative profit but their tactic was to appeal as much as possible to get an audience. They might have attracted the audience to come watch but it doesn't mean they satisfied viewers. Like I said, they had the return profit but they aren't continuing the series, why? because they went off on the story line and they will have to change the whole story. They could reap the profits from these series because its going to be a long book series. But instead they tried it their own way. 2 and 1/2 years later since the movie and the book sequel came out. If it wasnt a failure then they would've been in production by now.

We don't know for certain, but its pretty safe to say that John inherited Pitticus powers. And my guess is that the his fire ability is the most important one which distinctively sets him as a leader. Fire that portrays the last life of his home planet burning within him, is now number 6 ability. Also Number 6 background was centered around invisibility. Her ability to escape the underground prison. Number 8 who is the real teleporter is now going to have either invisibility or some other legacy. You have to understand that their legacy make their personality. They messed up big time. That's like giving Ron Weasley a scar on his forehead.

are you sure about this? from where did you get the news??


http://ian4ph.wordpress.com/category/...
"There’s been some talk in the past couple of months about trying to do something…"
All of you guys that are fans of the lorien legacies, check it out! Spread the word:)


http://ian4ph.wordpress.com/category/...
"There’s been some talk in the past couple of months about tr..."
SIGN THE PETITION AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE GUYS !! IT'LL HELP !! AND SPREAD THE WORD.


Amen - I really hope they do the books justice. The 2nd Percy Jackson I thought was quite bad, personally liked the first one though.


it wasn't a flop. they made 130 million dollars with it and had a 50 million dollar budget.
I can see no reason why there shouldn't be a sequel to it.

I liked the movie, and the books, despite the plotlines varying away from each other a bit. It would be great to see the rest of the series adapted, even if it required re-shooting the first film. Fantasy fiction is great when you see it come to life. James Frey and Jobie Hughes, aka Pittacus Lore, did a great job with this series and continue to do so. They are modern day Orson Welles in the style of his 'War of the Worlds' broadcast.
Otis wrote: "I don't know if any of you even read the book that I read. The movie was friggin' identical. I mean they followed everything accept for a few minor details like him being fire proof and being able ..."
(In the movie version) You know that scene where, Bernie Kosar or Hadley, Number Four's chimaera, shape shifts, steps in to defend Number Four from the Piken and there's a brief moment when there is eye contact between BK/Hadley and Number Four? Well, I reads that this scene was supposed to be one of the representations of them communicating (Number Four's ability to talk to animals)but it didn't translate well to audiences.
Even with the variation of the book plot, I thought the movie was good, which brought one of my favorite characters to screen life, Number Six. It's ashame that the adaption didn't meet enough mass approval needed to continue adapting the series, but I have the 'The Hunger Games' trilogy features to pacify me.
(In the movie version) You know that scene where, Bernie Kosar or Hadley, Number Four's chimaera, shape shifts, steps in to defend Number Four from the Piken and there's a brief moment when there is eye contact between BK/Hadley and Number Four? Well, I reads that this scene was supposed to be one of the representations of them communicating (Number Four's ability to talk to animals)but it didn't translate well to audiences.
Even with the variation of the book plot, I thought the movie was good, which brought one of my favorite characters to screen life, Number Six. It's ashame that the adaption didn't meet enough mass approval needed to continue adapting the series, but I have the 'The Hunger Games' trilogy features to pacify me.
Miahz wrote: "Like everyone else, I read the book right after i watched the movie. Now I look at the movie in disappointment because they pretty much twisted key parts of the story that lay down the outline late..."
You never know, some film company may succumb to the mass fan pressure, and film the entire series (including taking another crack at adapting 'I Am Number Four') - here's hoping for wishes or at least driven protests to come true.
You never know, some film company may succumb to the mass fan pressure, and film the entire series (including taking another crack at adapting 'I Am Number Four') - here's hoping for wishes or at least driven protests to come true.

Well, I don't know if you read the rest of the books, but John being fireproof isn't a minor detail. And really "Movies and books cannot be delivered the same way"? lol Tell that to Peter Jackson, who won 17 oscars for one movie trilogy.




i for one think they should make all six books into a movie...ive read all the book available and they are all equally good...but i think if they do they should keep more to the story line

I thought the Percy Jackson movie adaptation was better than expected. I mean the lighting thief was crap, but when I watched the sea of monsters... it had defiantly gone better. the one movie adaptation I really hated and I thought was a waste of time was "the mortal instruments: city of bones" that movie was so bad and rushed. I fell that big books with heavy pot and a lot of characters each having unique characteristics, if they were to be adapted to a motion picture, should be done in a 2-3 part movie series or a long movie. Yes I know that its hard and costly but at least most book fans wont hate the adaptation.




all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic