Miévillians discussion
Perdido Str Station Discussion
>
PSS SECTION 2: Chapters 4-6

On the other hand, it is frustrating to want to say something about what you are reading, and you have to wait until it's gone right out of your head again.
Looking at the list of "what members think" about this book, it does seem as if most members have read it already. I'll send out a member message soon, just give me an hour or so) in which I'll ask members if they mind if we start with the discussions already.
Watch this space-- I'll be back.

Will be back here for the official start of this section, will wait for Greenwich mean time thingy.

Let's hope it doesn't come to that, so, in the meantime, I cordially request that we extend the courtesy of patience to the rest of the group.
Once the weekend is upon us, I will open an additional 2 or 3 sections for discussion. :)

I'm opening section 3 as well.
So, post away!
Scribble, anything more you wanted to say regarding the Remade?
Mr Motley?
..and Yagharek?

Chapter four impressions:
Lin: She was intelligent enough to realize that her excitement was childish, but not mature enough to care.
Bad news. And here is where Lin's and Isaac's paths diverge. Being set up for later conflict.
Motley equating New Crobuzon with being Remade and discussing transition. He is interested in the hybrid zone. Very appealing to the artist in Lin. And then he is revealed to be the theme of which he speaks. Bit overdone calling him Motley. He is obviously a crew of body parts.
Chapter 5 Impressions:
Yagharek appeals to the same motivation in Isaac as that to which Motley appeals in Lin. And both are criminals - one in a legal system not understood, and one in a legal system with equally gruesome forms of punishment (and the basis for the legal system is also obscured for the reader).
Lin is now in the service of one criminal, Isaac in the service of another, both as a result of their unconventional (and successful) approaches to their work. They have both received equally challenging commissions. Conflict between Motley and Yagharek?
Isaac is as immature as Lin - he thinks of himself as the main station for all schools of thought - equating himself to a "lost" terminus....
Yagharek's name....if the Garuda are from the desert, it is not the desert of Egypt. I'm inclined to think rather India or other regions of Sanskrit languages.
Chapter 6 Impressions:
Anarchy described as communism...well, I suppose if you must, Mr Mieville, club your readers about the ears to make sure they've understood your point.
Shunday....delightful!
Isaac...manipulative - enjoys pulling unseen strings. Lin is a repository for his ambition.

Chapter 4-6 was hiding at the bottom like a naughty boy. I can try to stick him up top with glue for you...


Nice! You've really made sense for me of the introduction to that scene, Annie. Thank you.

oh!! very clever Annie!

Chapter 4: Lin is confronted by scenes of control and fear as she walks through the office to meet Mr. Motley. Then we hear talk about transition. This is a very powerful chapter and I expect these themes will continue throughout the book.
We are shocked by the revelation of Mr. Motley's physical shape.
Motley means "of variegated colour, or having elements of great variety or incongruity; heterogeneous." It was used to describe the costume of a court jester. I will be looking out for the second allusion in my future reading.
The way the name is phrased, ie "Mr" seems Victorian, and Dickensian. "Mr" is a term of respect, but less so than "Lord" or similar honorific.
Chapter 5: here we are shocked again by Yagharek's mutilation, echoing that of the revelation of Mr. Motley. Here Yagharek is less whereas Mr. Motley is more.
I wonder if Yagharek is being deliberately obtuse in explaining his crime or if he is genuinely unable to do so.
On page 45 Isaac explains how he likens himself to the Perdido Street Station. He uses metaphors for synthesis, joining, transition, transit.
Chapter 6: begins beautifully, with New Crobuzon was a city unconvinced by gravity . Oh I love this - gives the city a living presence, with a will of it's own.
We see Isaac's unscrulupous behaviour. He is captivated by the intellectual problem of restoring flight. But he falls asleep dreaming a loving dream of Lin.

Will reply soon in more detail to your posts, but has anyone wondered, along with me, what Mr Motley's motivations might possibly be for being so...-much?

I can't help thinking he looks like Zoidberg, which I have to say fits in with Mieville's style and preoccupations.


Andrea, i think i somehow missed the full motivation in my first read. There was so much to take in and to try to assimilate, that i never quite manged to make sense of Motley's obsessions.
Transitions yes--of course, that is the initial hint of obsession we get; but was it ever fully developed? We'd have to look out for some kind of satisfactory explanation as we go through the novel again, methinks.
Of course, when you first meet him, you do consider the possibility that he was made to look this way as punishment. ..and then you start to wonder, because of the focus on transitions, ..and then you start getting hints that he actually might want to be this way.
Who knows-- maybe it was indeed a punishment when it started, and then he started to get fixated on the idea, and wanted more and more--like he wanted to be everything and everyone at once.
Which brings me to the question of the idea of remade as a punishment.
What do you people think of the idea?
Of course, physically it wouldn't work in our world, since our bodies would reject foreign protein, but obviously the New Cruzoboners have figured a way around that.

Nice observations. I do find that to me some aspects of this novel doesn't tie in with the rest quite often, though, i must admit. I'll start to complain about these more vociferously later on in the novel.

If it were possible, I'd love to visit New Crobuzon and find out exactly how they managed that. That'd solve a good deal of problems on this side.

Mieville throws tons of ideas out there, as you can see. Some less palatable than others, heh. :)

Mieville throws tons of ideas out there, as you can see..."
I'll be reading along, but I'll mostly be lurking. I'm more of the analyze-when-I'm-done than the analyze-as-I-go-along type, so I'll be doing more absorbing than talking. But I'll try my best to participate, especially if the Remades continue to be a source of discussion. It's a nice change to talk about prosthesis and grafts outside of a classroom setting.

Earlier, when Lin and Issac are eating breakfast Issac appreciates the same spot on Lin's neck as a lover.
The trasformation point is the same stuff that Issac is seeking in his research. He is unstoppable and relentless in his efforts as is Motley of Lin and his own self image.

It is the way a regime can terrorize its citizens into living in completely uninhabital conditions. Its also what makes crime so viable. I' m assuming the Militia/Government and major crime organizations have allot of overlap in personnel.

Regarding the remade, although some of the punishments are horrific indeed, we do note that sometimes this is done as choice to enhance people and creatures in a functional way - like the guy in The Scar who had himself remade to become more amphibian, for instance.

Chapter four impressions:
Lin: She was intelligent enough to realize that her excitement was childish, but not mature enough to care.
Bad news. And here is where Lin's and Isaac's path..."
Hi Scribble, I'm intrigued with your tie-ins of Bas Lag places and those on Earth: earlier you mentioned PSS seemed like Liverpool Station to you, and here you're referencing Egypt/India. The reason I say this is because personally, I was struck, even before joining this discussion, with the fact that at no pint in the narrative does Mielville allude to any continuity or link between real Earth history and Bas Lagian history, despite the fact that there are obviously humans in Bas lag (although.....but later). The reason this struck me is that in most sci-fi books, even though placed well into the future, there is always (even if tenuous) reference to 'our history', whereas in PSS there is not: its almost as if though Bas Lag exists on some planet where Earth and our mores are not known, an alternate reality for humans.....if they are indeed humans. I say this because we assume that these Bas Lag humans are like us, but perhaps they are not....

Yagharek's evasiveness: I think, Mielville, who has lived abroad, knows that there are soome cultural concepts which get lost in translation. For example, imagine trying to explain yourself if you were Amondawa:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-env...

Absolutely true, I have been thinking humanoid but not necessarily human. It's good not to assume ANYTHING.

Like i mentioned in a later thread, Mieville likes to use London as a model, but as Andrea says: It's good not to assume ANYTHING. :P ;)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-env... "
Hmm, i want to be an Amondawaian. Then i might stay young forever. :P
*Trav feels proud that she was one of the persons who recced Ligotti and Lovecraft to Knig*
But yes, interesting point about the different cultural concepts. I would imagine these would apply especially with the Kephri and the Rusalka. Did you ever see my review of this? http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
I waffle on a bit about the PSS creatures on it. Including quite a bit on the Garuda.

Absolutely true, I have been thinking humanoid but ..."
Me too! The one thing that makes it difficult to read and most enjoyable at the same time, for me, is Mieville's constant challenge, like he's standing in the wings saying, 'This is not your world, and they are not like you. At all.'



Yeah, well, I have come to realize that you find a treasure trove if you take it for granted that almost all of Mieville's creatures are allusions. Almost all the creatures in PSS are mythological, except for the cactus people, where he seems to have been alluding to video games.
That Garuda in your pic looks very Native American. Interesting, because the ones i had originally found, had been Hindu.

and yes, 'twas you who put me onto Lovecraft and Ligotti!

It was inside the komodo dragon house, so I was assuming it was Indonesian/Hindu.

It was the kind of feathery 'headdress' that made me think N.A.
..but i suppose garudas would have feathers, so the feathery look figures.


I don't think so. They called Al Capone "Scarface". It's a nom de crime, not the name he was born with.
"Lin is now in the service of one criminal, Isaac in the service of another, both as a result of their unconventional (and successful) approaches to their work"
Well, there's not much similarity between Motley and Yagharek (well, they both have feathers). Motley is an unapprehended criminal, while, technically, Yagharek has paid his debt to his society.
"Anarchy described as communism...well, I suppose if you must, Mr Mieville, club your readers about the ears to make sure they've understood your point."
I've read the your-anarchy-may-not-be-my-anarchy thread, but I beg to differ. Miéville really is describing communism, not anarchy. After all, the man knows his communism... Garuda society is quite strongly regulated. I believe the Garuda would call anarchists "abstract individuals".


Recurring themes in Miéville:
- London
- Squid
- Moby Dick
I'm glad Annie found the Moby Dick-ness in PSS, because I'd missed it. The Scar and Railsea are both complete reincarnations of Moby Dick.

Please only open a thread when you've already read the contents of the chapters described in the thread title, or else you'll be spoiled.
Remember that we said at the beginning of the read, in the "preparation" section, that our group has vastly varying reading speeds, (as measured by the poll we did), and to avoid frustration for the faster readers, we will be opening the whole book in advance so that the faster readers can go ahead and the slower ones have only small sections of book to deal with per section (roughly 40 pages), so that when they open that section, they should have already read that part, and therefore it won't spoil anything for them if others have already posted there.
So, if you see others posting ahead of you, please don't worry about that, just keep reading and posting at your own pace, these threads aren't going to run away. We will still be here when you reach that part of the read.
Some of the members who promised that they were going to take part in these discussions, have not even started at all yet, and they may still decide to come in at some stage, so, don't worry, i'm pretty sure there will always be someone to talk to about issues in the threads.
Keep in mind that i have also gone to some measures to have these topics show up on the book's home page, so we might just pick up some members as we go along, who might see our threads and may want to have their say as well.
This is why I'm trying to say only the bare minimum in my little thread introductions, to give you guys leeway and space to write down your thoughts and interpretations.

Well spotted.
Magister also means "master" or "teacher" in Latin.
It is close to the English legal word "Magistrate", which is a lower form of Judge who deals with smaller cases.

I want to follow up on Andrea’s cogent comment about Isaac’s discussion with Yagharek:
Andrea wrote: "On page 45 Isaac explains how he likens himself to the Perdido Street Station. He uses metaphors for synthesis, joining, transition, transit..."
Expanding this idea a bit: Isaac responds to Yagharek’s quest (and question) by describing himself:
I’m your best bet, I reckon. I’m not a chymist, or a biologist, or a thaumaturge…I’m a dilettante, Yagharek, a Dabbler. I think of myself…as the main station for all the schools of thought. Like Perdido Street Station… All the train lines meet there…everything has to pass through it. That’s like me. That’s my job. That’s the kind of scientist I am. I’m being frank with you. Thing is, you see, I think that’s what you need.”
I think these statements, and the Perdido Street Station metaphor, are full of portent for the approach that Isaac takes to Yagharek’s problem.(view spoiler)
Isaac’s self-description resonated with me because it reminds me of my preferred approach to science (and much of my graduate training). But scientists in general are trained to test a specific hypothesis or premise, usually as a consequence or instance of a larger ongoing project. And most funding for science is critically dependent on this hypothetical/deductive model, where the objectives and predicted results are very clearly spelled out to the funding agencies in advance.
So I think Isaac’s scientific instincts are a big part of the reason that he left the University. It is much more natural (and productive) for him to do the science his way, and his former bosses would very likely not condone this approach. This is consistent with Ian’s earlier comments.
There are other implications as well, I think, for later developments in the book.(view spoiler)

This is why i love group reads, and i'm really loving this one, thank you all so much!
If it had not been for Jim, for instance, i would have missed the wonderful metaphors he mentions. :)
For me this book is chock-full full of allusions and metaphors, and I would have missed half of them had it not been for all you wonderful Mievillians out there, who are all adding to the picture of Perdido Street Station.
Thank you, Jim! Never too late on this read, stroll along at your own pace, the threads aren't going anywhere. :)


"I'm a dilettante...a dabbler...I think of myself as the main station for all the schools of thought.
I love the fact that Isaac is an intersection, a meeting point, an opportunity to synthesise thesis and antithesis, and arrive at something new (is it a dialectical approach, Trav?).
I think institutional scientists can become victim to trends and feel they have to side politically with a/the trend, which limits their academic freedom.
Whereas Isaac is no slave to anything but the integrity of his ideas.
And much emerges from his faith in his ideas in the novel.
This is why I can't really see him as naive. I see him as successful, but outside the mainstream.

Thanks so much for the kind words, Trav! Very much appreciated. I am actually well along in the reading, but will try to add a little something to the discussion threads as I read through the comments.

Thanks so much, Nataliya! Great to have your expertise as we go through this fascinating book, and I am loving the group discussions as well. :)
Now, if I could just tap into a fresh supply of time and energy...

"I'm a dilettante...a dabbler...I think of myself as the main station for all the schools of thought.
I love the fact that Isaac is an intersection, a meeting point, an opportunity to synthesise thesis and antithesis, and arrive at something new (is it a dialectical approach, Trav?)..."
Thanks very much, Ian! I agree with all of your comments about Isaac and academic freedom. I do think that CM may regard Isaac's approach as dialectical - a very interesting point. I also got a sense that CM may identify fairly strongly with Isaac's analytical tools.
Scientists like Isaac are sometimes referred to as 'Renaissance men', for their interests in all things intellectual. On the other hand, some would describe the same intellect as 'a mile wide and an inch deep', and Isaac's depiction of himself as a dilettante plays to the latter.
But a dilettante cannot work on the outer edges of a theoretical envelope as Isaac does, and he knows that perfectly well. My sense is that CM is letting this point sink in as the action moves along.

I think that CM keeps the crime intentionally vague at this point in the story is important and that this particular crime is a cardinal sin.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Scar (other topics)Railsea (other topics)
In this section, we become more closely acquainted with the idea of 'remade' creatures, and we meet Mr Motley.
I'd be very interested to hear readers' opinions of both.
We also make a more intimate acquaintance with Yagharek. Interesting, isn't he?