UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion

This topic is about
Marc Nash
Past Live Events
>
Live Event with Marc Nash - Today at 7:30
message 51:
by
Lorraine
(new)
Nov 29, 2012 11:52AM

reply
|
flag

Hi denise! *waves*


not really. I'm terribly unmusical really. Never DJ'd in my life - I'd be too cack handed and would drop the records!

Hi Rosemary! *waving*

no they're not really based on people I know. I honestly believe all characters represent some part of the writer. In my case, usually the parts of me that don't get seen terribly often in the day to day. I learn about myself in writing characters that seem far removed from me, but aren't all that strange to me.

I also wouldn't feel comfortable putting real people from my life in my books. It would seem like an invasion of their privacy somehow. They wouldn't have a public right of reply if they disagreed with how I'd portrayed them

not really. I'm terribly unmusical really. Never DJ'd in..."
Been clubbing a lot then?"
Not really. Why pay over the odds for the privilege of having 50 songs of which I maybe would choose 3 to dance to? I prefer to throw shapes in my bedroom to my own playlists!

who's Schwarzy?

who's Schwarzy?"
Arnold ! Sorry it's easier that way, I can't spell his name for the life of me !

I do like the female main character Karen Dash from my debut novel. She's so tough and scabrously funny. But she'd terrify me in the flesh I think :-)

I do like the female main character Karen Dash from my debut novel. She's so tough an..."
LOL! I think Karen would scare anyone!

It's weird, but every new piece you finish writing you think is the best thing ever, until the next one comes along. I can't really explain why I keep falling for this.
I think my favourite short story is one called "If It Were Thee" which dealt with a lot of ideas in just 900 words. I was very proud of that one.

If I don't like a character, then I guess it means I don't like part of myself! I've written unpleasant characters, but they have to have some redeeming humanity about them, or the reader will despise them

who's Schwarzy?"
Arnold ! Sorry it's easier that way, I can't spell his name for ..."
Doh! Got it! Am I a fan? Yes and no. He's brilliant doing the limited range of roles that he gets cast in. But he's probably a bit old for them now, plus being Governor of California soemwhat dented his cred in my eyes!

*It helps to imagine Lorraine in her underwear ... but then that's also a general rule.

I do like the female main character Karen Dash from my debut novel. She'..."
she's interesting, because clearly she's smart and tough, yet she's really stuck and also very constrained by the world she moves in

*It helps to imagine Lorraine in her underwear ... but then that's also a general rule."
I'm eating cold chips in the breaks. Not sure how that fits in with your recipe for success!

Yeah, I must admit the digitally enhanced him in the latest Terminator (or was that earliest?) was kinda weird !

If I don't like a character, then I guess it means I don't like part of myself! I've ..."
I think some characters can be despicable - so long as there are others in there that you do care about. Books I have abandoned are ones where I really don't care about any of the characters.

editing! I hate it. Never know if I've been ruthless enough. For me all the fun is in that blank sheet of the first draft. Second draft onwards - and this is for me, not necessarily all writers - the creativity has largely gone out of it and it's quite a dry process.

*It helps to imagine Lorraine in her underwear ... but then that's also a general rule."
DARREN YOU CHEEKY BOY !!!


who's Schwarzy?"
Arnold ! Sorry it's easie..."
Schwartzy! lol! He's a marmite character!

gosh, that's an almost impossible, since most of them have unhappy endings!
But I also think I am them, or they are me. Parts of me at least. I'm going to have to try and think of a proper answer to this question!

*Digitally enhanced* for a body builder that's not good is it! :-)

If I don't like a character, then I guess it means I don't like part of ..."
I prefer having unreliable narrators, those who keep the reader off balance. They're not necessarily despicable

who's Schwarzy?"
Arnold ! Sor..."
Or Fulham's goalkeeper!

well it's a mixture of things Kath. I've written a flash piece where someone is desperately trying to recall a breaking-up conversation, and their memory is trying to get the words right in order to analyse them, but of course the words are jumbled, rearranged, lost etc. That's how we have conversations, again from my playwriting days.
But it's also a couple of scientific ideas, that of different choices leading to different outcomes that fork off into different worlds and different realities. And then the Butterfly Effect, which states that it's impossible to predict complex system because even a tiny change at the outset (the flapping of a butterfly's wings) can change all that follows after it radically by a chain reaction of knock on effects./ I was interested in structuring a novel around that.


I wanted to keep the thing fairly straightforward in terms of the words, so it could let me be a bit more complex in the structure. When you write dialogue, it has to be believable that someone would actually speak like that. You can always tell unrealistic dialogue. So the discipline of that kept the language in check.


Hi Anne! *waves*

PS I wondered if that was what the butterfly was doing at the start of Time after Time!

I like the idea of time travel - but don't think about it too much otherwise my brain explodes! I take it all at face value!


time after time (well my opinion anyway) can be read on many different levels, there is scope to read it just as a good story and accept all the scenario stuff and time travel and just enjoy the ride. but there is also room to really think about the concepts and get in deeper. and then there are all the levels in between...

that's the weird thing. I didn't read as a boy, too busy playing sports. So i don't actually know. But one of my twins is exactly the same; never picks up a book, but he is so eloquent with a stunning vocabulary. Could it be genetic? I did always make sure I explained everything when they asked questions and I didn't simplify the language when I talked to them, so maybe that was nurture more than nature?
I am a good observer of people, so I pick up on their conversations. Also I'm an only child, so my parents always included me when they had their adult friends round. maybe these things contributed?

Yea it definitely gives food to the mind ! Like do men honestly think that a world ruled by women would end up being like that !!??? ;)

I think so Marc. We never talked baby to our son, and he's always been more advanced with his vocabulary than most children his age :)