A Game of Thrones
discussion
Jon Snow is a lot better than Ned Stark's children. Don't you think Jon deserves to be treated fairly by Catelyn?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Meryl
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
Oct 26, 2012 11:27AM

reply
|
flag

the more we see of cat the more we see a petty and jealous streak in her, the more we a pointed contrast to ned's stoic and rational demeanor. their entire relationship hinged on duty and honor, and though i'm sure they grew to love each other, I don't truly believe that they were actually in love.

I don't know how far you are in the series, but I just finished book 3 and I really don't think I am going to get my wish.

Edit: removed offending spoiler

Add insult to injury, Jon looked like and was more like Ned than any of his own sons. That had to really pain her.
Ultimately, I adore Jon and don't really care for Cat, but I don't blame her for what she cant' help.
If you ask me, the one thing they should have done was allowed him at the feast when the King came to visit. Ned condoned that behaviour, you can't just blame Cat.

Don't you think this spoiler should have been contained to book 1! Really pissed. It's like you wrote that just to piss people off, it has nothing to do with the context. WTG &*#@!!

if you're referring to the same spoiler I see (the one in the spoiler tag), it's not really a spoiler...it's more of a theory that some readers have. I had a HUGE spoiler dumped on me in one discussion, so I know how bad it sucks to not get to find out for yourself, but she actually didn't reveal any plot points or anything! happy (unspoiled) reading! :)

I don’t understand the title of this thread. Why does Jon deserve better than Ned’s children? He is one of Ned’s children! (Fan theories aside, anyway.)

and jon better than his other children? i think you would need to determine what you meant by better :) more honourable? interesting character?, either way I think we all have our favourites among the Stark children, to me Arya is the best character in the book so Jon doesn't compare!

Why in the world would a 'theory' be labeled as a spoiler? That's even worse... and still has nothing to do w/ book 1 or even 2, 3 or 4. I was assuming I was in for a shock in 5. Here's to hoping your correct. (And no, you don't need to reiterate, I'd rather assume and hope for the best).

I have edited the orginal to remove the offending comment.

Well, at the time, I thought it was actual and came from as far out as book 5. It was a huge shock to see in discussion for book 1; though perhaps my assumption that spoilers will be contained within the book of topic is wrong.
Needless to say, I'm glad it's just a theory.

I couldn't agree more with you about Arya being the best character but for me the most interesting is the little man.

The best thing about this series is that no one is perfect and you cant hate or love a person absolutely. Everyone has his or her flaws and redeeming qualities.




Now, she's trying to make the best of things and has even come to respect and care for Ned over the years.
But then, that same man you are trying to build a life with comes home with a child not yours and gives him a place in a home you really didn't want in the first place.
I can totally see why she's embraced the bitter. She wanted a family with the brother, and got a bastard to raise. She's from a proud family and I can understand why she'd be stubborn about it. It was likely very embarrassing for her. Especially when Ned treats Jon equally with her children.
Not that it's right, just that I can see her point on that one.



I don't think Jon is particularly wonderful, but otherwise I agree. Part of Cat's negative attitude towards Jon stems from jealousy: she believes that Jon is the son of the woman Ned really loved (Ashara Dayne, according to gossip), even though he was forced to marry Cat. Mistreating Jon is Cat's (admittedly very immature) way of expressing her jealousy towards his mother.


If we are discussing our favourite Stark children here, I'd say that Jon is my favourite, followed by Arya, then Bran, then Sansa, then Rob.


Of course Catelyn goes out of her way to be cruel to Jon! In what is their first conversation (and IIRC, their only one in the first two books) in GoT, Catelyn tells Jon that it should have been him instead of Bran who fell from the tower, and who, at that point in time, was in a coma, and possibly dying. It is extremely nasty and completely unwarranted, given that all Jon is doing in that scene is crying over Bran, and trying to comfort Cat. After that scene, I was determined to hate Cat - but fortunately, she turned out to be a much more nuanced character, and I started liking her again later in the book.
It's possible to read her cruel words in this scene as her simply lashing out in her grief at someone she didn't particularly like. But that doesn't change the fact that from Jon's point of view, the closest thing he has to a mother wishes him dead.



yeah, I had a very hard time liking her after she said that to jon.

(though I'm pretty sure if anybody could pull it off, it'd be G.R.R. Martin)



Bingo. That is precisely the reason in my opinion too. And FWIW, we see a little more of that in the coming books.








I always wanted to be a step-parent, so to see one portrayed like such a shrew made it hard for me to read. I thought I had picked up a Disney story... and then read the rest of the series and WOW, not Disney!


So to me, Catelyn is a bit overboard. Vindictiveness? Spite? I haven't read all the books yet, but I believe her attitude toward Jon isn't very just at all.

In terms of the way that he was treated by Catelyn I agree with a lot of the previous posteres. Catelyn is a member of the nobility and although having basterd children does appear to be a common thing the fact that it is being thrown in her face must be incredibly galling. Another poster brought up the fact that Catelyn was originally in love with Neds brother, so to not only lose the man you love but to have your husband cheat on you and have proof of it in front of you every day must be incredibly hard. In some ways I am surprised that she is as 'polite' as she is to him.
I do agree that what she says to him after Brans fall from the tower is incredibly harsh and unwarranted but she is an emotional wreck at this point, the vast majority of her family are leaving her whilst one of her youngest children is basically on deaths door - a fear she had obviously had as she asked him not to climb again. She is just lashing out and Jon happened to be the best scapegoat for it.
TBH I think she is blaming Jon for things which aren't his fault - she ought to be blaming Ned but she can't do that. So although Jon does deserve fair treatment (he never asked to be born out of wedlock) given the various circumstances he was, unfortunately, never going to get that.

Why would you even think that? What makes him better?
If anything, he abandoned the family to serve in some backwater useless order of celibate runts.

He didn't abandon the family. The choice was compelled upon him by his father - the idea planted by Catelyn.. He tried to escape a few times to return to his family but Samwell consistently interfered.
I disagree that Jon is "a lot" better than his half siblings (barring Sansa) but he is on par with them and, perhaps, may exceed them in destiny. We just have to wait and see.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic