I don't want to start an argument... I do have an honest question-
How did this book get such good reviews?
I read this book carefully, in its entirety, and even looked up a few of the things she claims to confirm their accuracy. One of them was inaccurate. I'm guessing I'll find others. But that's a different discussion.
This book got higher ratings than Dawkins' The God Delusion and I find that baffling. I simply do not understand how that is possible.
It is not well written; if Christina had stayed with blogging, or completely converted everything into a different style for the book form, it would have been better. If there were footnotes for her factual claims, it would have been better. And I could go on. But these are not the case.
Are people rating this book highly just because they agree with her atheism?
How did this book get such good reviews?
I read this book carefully, in its entirety, and even looked up a few of the things she claims to confirm their accuracy. One of them was inaccurate. I'm guessing I'll find others. But that's a different discussion.
This book got higher ratings than Dawkins' The God Delusion and I find that baffling. I simply do not understand how that is possible.
It is not well written; if Christina had stayed with blogging, or completely converted everything into a different style for the book form, it would have been better. If there were footnotes for her factual claims, it would have been better. And I could go on. But these are not the case.
Are people rating this book highly just because they agree with her atheism?