Richard III discussion

120 views
Book Discussions > Under the Hog by Patrick Carleton

Comments Showing 51-90 of 90 (90 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 2 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Ikon, not yet. I had already started The Glass Blowers by D du M so I'll finish that first. Under the Hog is an ILL and I only have three weeks so I can't put it off until your's comes unfortunately.

My library holds are all coming out at once. I've been waiting for The Bronze Horseman for months (a big fat sucker) and now that one's ready for pickup.


message 52: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments That is the way of the world. I didn't mean you should wait for me. I am just curious to know if all my breast-beating and moans for help in finding this book were worth it. ;)


message 53: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
You really want me to tell you if the book sucks? Or find out for yourself?


message 54: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments I would like your opinion - not that I will necessarily agree with it. After all, I have found several books praised by group members to be not to my taste. Chacun a son gout. ;)


message 55: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
No one is going to like the same book every time, even when you find someone who has tastes in books always in line with yours. Then all of a sudden you're like "did we read the same book?" That's just life.


message 56: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments Misfit, I have just received my copy of "Under the Hog". I think I love AbeBooks.

The information on the front leaves of the book is the same as on the back leaves. It is a formal, almost chant-like recitation of the lineage of (first page) Edward IV and the ending of the House of York. On the opposite page is the lineage of Edward, Prince of Lancaster and Henry Tydder(spelled that way). There is no mistaking the bias of the compiler.

I will send you the text if you wish.

BTW: As is my revolting habit, I have read the very ending part. I think the book will be less of a disappointment than the last two. *fingers crossed*


message 57: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
I'll have to watch your progress. It might just be me today but I've put it aside for the moment, although I've passed on starting two other books as well.

You read the ending? I could never ever do that with anybook. No way, no how.


message 58: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments I know how it has to end so I am not exactly spoiling a surprise. I always have to psyche myself up to deal with the ending so this is a way of desensitizing myself in advance. ;)

I think in my heart of hearts, I keep hoping that I will be transferred somehow to an alternate universe in which the Tydder falls and all is well in England.


message 59: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Guess you're right when it comes to books on Richard - we do know how it all ends don't we?


message 60: by Susan (new)

Susan (boswellbaxter) | 418 comments I always look to the ending when I get a book--except, sometimes, with a mystery. Sick, isn't it?

And with books from this era, I always flip around first to see how the author treats Buckingham.


message 61: by Ikonopeiston (last edited Mar 10, 2009 06:07AM) (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments I have found an apparent error in the American foreword to the book. George Morley Acklom states that Colyngbourne, who wrote that rude rhyme, was beheaded. Everywhere else I have read about this states that he was drawn and quartered - the whole treatment.


message 62: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Ikon, how you doing with this one?


message 63: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments Still cannot read easily. I am planning to try to start it this afternoon.


message 64: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments I have read the first fifty pages of this book and am very impressed with the skill of the writer. He uses a most effective device to lay out the history of the Yorks and Lancasters and bring the reader up to snuff before tossing him in medias res.

The first scene is set at the court of Louis XI where Clarence and Warwick are trying to winkle money and ships out of the French king. By way of persuading him, they talk about the events which have led them into exile. It is adroitly done with the conversation shifting from one to the other and quickly summarizes the history of the WOTR up to the moment.

The descriptions of the personages are vivid and unconventional. I liked the phrase about Edward IV - "lovely as a girl". Much is made of his cognomen, "The Rose of Rouen". Dear me, they surely were taken with roses at that time. ;)


message 65: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Thank you. It might have been my mood of the day. I'll dig in again soon - its between that and The Bronze Horseman that I don't have all the library time in the world.


message 66: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments I forgot to mention another lovely description. The thinning hair on the top of Warwick's head is referred to as "helmet hair". *giggle*


message 67: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Ikonopeiston wrote: "I forgot to mention another lovely description. The thinning hair on the top of Warwick's head is referred to as "helmet hair". *giggle*"

I missed that, or else I haven't come to it yet. Helmet hair in the 1930's when this one was written? Who'd have thunk?



message 68: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments I am visualizing Warwick wearing his helmet to meals, to bed, whilst making love ... This is getting more and more Monty Python.


message 69: by MAP (new)

MAP | 181 comments Wait, with all the Under the Hog readers, should we make that our next group read? Should I go drop obscene amounts of money (that I don't have at the moment, but will spend on historical novels because I'm pathetic) to obtain this book?


message 70: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
I don't know if anyone wants to spend that kind of money on this (we know how Ikon is though). If we all shot for an ILL at the same time and there's only so many library copies available......


message 71: by MAP (new)

MAP | 181 comments I can try once I make it back up to my university. They came through for me with "A Girl and 5 Brave Horses" which is even more obscure, so I wouldn't be surprised if they could find this too.

There's not much I like about my university, but they do seem to be pretty efficient about ILL. (Unless, of course, it's an article I need for my thes*s. Then they're slow as turtles!)


message 72: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
I love the ILL program. Half the fun is seeing where in the country it came from. One time I had one from a Benedictine Abbey's library.


message 73: by MAP (new)

MAP | 181 comments Update: Uh, wow. I just went on my uni library's website to do the ILL only to discover that it actually has a copy of Under the Hog in its possession! No need to do a loan! Finally, something good about this place. Hurrah! I'll go get it as soon as I get back.


message 74: by Brian (new)

Brian (brianwainwright) | 149 comments I've got a copy of this book, I did read it, but I can't remember a thing about it. Very odd. Still, it gives me a motive to read it again. Mine is one of the American R3 Branch reprints, and it definitely didn't have a dust jacket when it arrived.


message 75: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
That's four of us then. I must get cracking on it, it must be returned on the 28th. No renewals for ILL's.


message 76: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Well, I have to confess that I've put this aside and probably won't pick it up again before its due. I found it quite dry and hard to stay along with it and it really wasn't bringing me anything new as far as Richard was concerned. Perhaps I'm just not in the right mood.


message 77: by MAP (new)

MAP | 181 comments Whoo! After everyone else has already finished/given up on this book, I've finally got it in my hot little hands. And it's not due back until mid-May either.


message 78: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
I'll be looking forward to your thoughts. Although you are probably so happy to get something that's not a romance you'll be in seventh heaven.


message 79: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments I have finished "Under the Hog" and my review of it is posted in the usual place. To spare any the suspense, I loved it and am still vibrating from the beauty of the words.


message 80: by MAP (new)

MAP | 181 comments What's your usual place?


message 81: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments At the book itself - you know, the review section. Just click on the title of the book and scroll down. I think I am the only person who has reviewed it.


message 82: by MAP (new)

MAP | 181 comments Oh. For some reason the first time I checked there nothing showed up. Or maybe I just didn't see it? I'm starting to think I have some sort of neurological visual disorder, like contralateral neglect, only it's "whatever I'm looking for I can't see" neglect.


message 83: by Ikonopeiston (new)

Ikonopeiston (Ikon) | 385 comments Don't worry. I am the nutzo one. I put the review in the wrong place and only got it up in the right one when you commented. Sorry, next time I'll try to get it right the first time. ;)


message 84: by MAP (new)

MAP | 181 comments I just started Under the Hog. (literally on page 6). Wow! They really toss you in the deep in of British history, don't they? I'm glad I already have an understanding of the War of the Roses and of the personal histories of Edward/George/Warwick, or I would be having a nervous breakdown.


message 85: by Mark (new)

Mark Grosshans | 2 comments I have almost finished Under the Hog and so far, I will say it is one of the best Richards I've met....will post again with final review in a couple days.


message 86: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Thanks Mark. Let us know when the review is up.


message 87: by RJay (new)

RJay (plantagenetjunkie) | 33 comments I found this book more about the history than about Richard himself and I was disappointed in that. It was a good book but not what I had hoped.


message 88: by Mark (new)

Mark Grosshans | 2 comments Excellent book and very well written! While the title suggests a focus on Richard, the fact that it wasn't was not disappointing, as Richard's character was quite intriguing...most intriguing I've come across. He looms in the background, singularly moral and sympathetic but at the same time dark and mysterious. The only complaint I have is the author's rendition of the fate of the princes. But since it was treated almost as an afterthought and since I fall on the side that considers Richard innocent of that charge, it did not change my opinion of the book as a whole. If you haven't read this book, please do...you won't be let down. If anyone can suggest further reading (fiction/non-fiction) of this caliber, please let me know.


message 89: by Misfit (new)

Misfit | 1139 comments Mod
Look at what's on Kindle! And only $.99.


message 90: by Darkpool (new)

Darkpool | 91 comments Squeeeee!!!!!


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top