The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
discussion
Depressing?
date
newest »



Oh, I never maintain the separation. I always become a part of the story, flitting from one character to another, or just a silent observer. I think that helps me enjoy the book a lot more.

Spoiler for later books:
(view spoiler)



Thought so. It does explain alot. The bodies in my basement for a start.

Perhaps you just don't like mankind :P
You guys, I don't mean like that awful kind of sadness when somebody dies or something terrible happens, rather the faint smell of it bothering you while you try to enjoy the story. Most of the time I was able to just ignore it, and I did REALLY enjoy the story, but I won't deny that it was there.

One person dies: it is a tradgedy. A million die: it is a statistic. A world blows up: Thats pretty cool and I want to be there to see it.

..."
...but what if you get blown up with it?

I think I was too busy looking forward to all the new adventures Arthur was going to have than worrying about the earth being destroyed. On the one door closes, another open philosophy. The earth wasn't there but he now had the whole universe to wander around in.
Liking the misquote there, Neil!
Although I will admit that Slartibartfast and his fjords did get a lump in the throat.
Liking the misquote there, Neil!
Although I will admit that Slartibartfast and his fjords did get a lump in the throat.

Does it make me a bad person that I think this is one of the coolest scenes in the movie?



No, I don't think the reader is meant to feel depressed, it's more an opportunity for comedy. Of course, it's sad when it happens, and it stays in your mind as an essential fact of the story, but its main purpose, as Mitali pointed out earlier, is black comedy. It's like in Terry Pratchett's The Colour of Magic when Ankh-Morpork gets set on fire in the beginning. Nobody would think to be depressed by that.

Ever watch doctor who? the earth gets almost destroyed every 3 episodes.

Comedy without an edge of depression/sadness would not be funny.







Beware of the leopard...


Let's hear it for funny looks! I think Adams did that on purpose so we too could add a few more awkward moments to our life.
I wasn't depressed that the earth was gone in the book just like I wasn't depressed by the end of the movie Dr. Strangelove because it wasn't the focal point, it was just something that happened. Adams had his true strength in describing human behavior & the mundane occurrences of life, people & things & situations that we face every day & he gets them so spot on that, for me, I'm too busy relating to & laughing at all the little things happening to the characters that the fact that the earth's gone becomes only interesting.

Every time I read about how long humanity has left (9,000 years-ish the most?) I think of this.

As for feeling sadness that the Earth was destroyed, I didn't feel it. I was too wrapped up in the humor of it all. Perhaps that makes me a little insensitive but it is fiction after all.
On that note, I have to wonder if there are extraterrestrial beings out there who do feel that Earth would be better off nonexistent...like Marvin the Martian. We do obstruct his view of Venus, you know. :-)


Agreeing with James I think it was more revealing because Adams was a freaking genius to reveal the naivete of human nature, the ugliness of human nature, and the hilarity of our faults. As far as the destruction of Earth, yeah that's depressing but you have to look at it from a literary perspective. The destruction of Earth was really symbolic of humanity's naivete and arrogance.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Yes, I enjoyed the novel, yes, I laughed, I cringed. But there was an undercurrent the whole time. EARTH IS GONE. MY HOME PLANET IS DESTROYED. ARE THERE POTATOES ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE UNIVERSE?
Note: I haven't read the other 4 novels. I just bought them though and will be starting soon.