Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

This topic is about
City of Ashes
Book Issues
>
Wrongfully combined
date
newest »

That's because the mini-stories and outtakes should not have been added as books at all, and are getting merged.

I thought we'd established previously that they were okay because they are "eBooks"?
Not book extras. Not unless they have either been actually published (i.e., released via Kindle, Nook, etc.) or the author otherwise designates them as separate works. Neither applies in this case, and someone is supposed to be deleting them shortly, so please combine them back so the deletions will be merges.


So deleted scenes / "slices of life" "published" on the author website should not be on GR?
As Vicky mentions I was under the impression that these where "published" shorts
So do items like this belong
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/85...
http://www.jrward.com/bdb/index-slice...
That one is a bit different, as it's not an extra to a specific book.
It's also substantially longer. I would keep that one, but please stop separating out the Clare ones. Just makes more work for me and Kara to have to recombine them.
It's also substantially longer. I would keep that one, but please stop separating out the Clare ones. Just makes more work for me and Kara to have to recombine them.

Are these going to be merged by an automated process or is it something I (or another super) can go ahead and do? I got a message from another librarian requesting for me to un-combine them since I was the last one on the log combining them since they were different works... and they seem to be causing a lot of confusion with people re-separating them.
She also mentioned that only super librarians could separate the editions? Was that a fail safe put in for this particular situation?
Vicky wrote: "She also mentioned that only super librarians could separate the editions?"
I don't think that is correct.
Deleting them from the front end is timing out. They need to be deleted from the back end.
I don't think that is correct.
Deleting them from the front end is timing out. They need to be deleted from the back end.

I don't think that is correct.
Deleting them from the front end is timing out. They need to be deleted f..."
Fair enough!
I went through, re-combined them all and added notes to not separate. Hopefully that will keep them combined until they can be gotten to! :)

I really should stay off GoodReads while I am working. Thank you!

I really should stay ..."
For the future it is easier to start a new thread than to request a change in an already established thread - but I uncombined your books for you.

What about the Twilight outtakes?
Don't they count too, if this was the case?
"Missing scenes" of any book, unless published via a publisher OR designated a book by the author (and published on their site or wherever) would not be books.

But, as far as I was concerned, the CoB outtakes/extras were published on Clare's website.
Or do I missed something?

Does that make sense?

. . . Kind of, I guess.

Oh well, I guess it doesn't matter in the long run but it does make things confusing - especially the way you combined my reviews because they now read like complete rubbish and it screwed up the dates I read the books and the shelves they were on.
someone seems to have combined all the actual books in the series with the respective mini-stories and out-takes available. I'm combing my way through, but if you could go and check too, maybe I've missed some. And perhaps there's more like these out there in other Series...
Thanks guys.