European Royalty discussion
Other Discussions
>
Group Reads - Input Requested!
date
newest »


I like the way the nominations are run, but I do think the idea of a poll to vote for the book for the month would be a good idea, but it does depend in overhead for you is it quicker to set up a poll or to count the votes.

One reviewer at Kirkus Reviews says - "Quite beguiling—but not for the genealogically challenged." Fair warning, but I think you should give it a go. Historian Alison Weir has delved deeper and deeper into British royalty, and brings to light the amazing story of Katherine de Roet, the low-born mistress of John of Gaunt, fourth son of Edward III. Their affair lasted for many years, and it became an outrageous scandal when they finally wed in middle age. An absolutely engrossing read, by an eminently readable historian.
Interesting! It's on my TBR list, definitely.


In the end it is what is easier for you or if you add an admin to help.

Splitting up by chapters is fine with me.
I also think it's fine to nominate more than one book. Because in the end you can only vote for one anyway.


Sara wrote: "I have a question about the polls in general (for anyone who might know). I notice that there is a start and end date. Will the poll "close" itself on the end date so no one else can vote? And i..."
I have done many polls on yahoo and there they automatically shut themselves down. It seems the ones I did here also did the same.
I have done many polls on yahoo and there they automatically shut themselves down. It seems the ones I did here also did the same.

I've been mulling this over in my head, and someone's post has finally gotten me to ask it. Would people prefer it if the nominating and voting happened one month earlier than they do now. So, for example, instead of voting right now for the June 15 - July 15 read, we would be voting for the July 15 - Aug 15 read. That way people would have more time to get the books for the group reads. If people wanted to do this, I would simply double up the nominating/voting threads once (next time they would normally come up - so we would cover two months at one time), and then after that we would go back to normal (one month at a time), only we would be nominating/voting on books farther in advance. Does this make sense? Would people like to do this?

Happy to go along with whatever.


I've been mulling this over in my head, and someone's post has finally gotten me to ask it. Would people prefer it if the nominating and voting happened one month earlier than the..."
Yes, please! I joined recently and couldn't find "The Hollow Crown" in time to start it. Also, life is sooo hectic, a little extra time to schedule it in would be fabulous!

I've been mulling this over in my head, and someone's post has finally gotten me to ask it. Would people prefer it if the nominating and voting happened one month ear..."
Discussion is really just starting on the Hollow Crown, so if you did manage to find it, definitely jump in. I just got it a couple of days ago myself.



As for discussions, do you like the way we do it now with folders set up for portions of the book? Would you prefer some guided questions like a book club might have or do you like the open nature of it? Would you prefer we split up sections by topic rather than chapter? Let us know! We want this to be a great reading experience for all!