Vampire Books Fans, Fangs and Writers discussion
VAMPIRE fiction

I don't know. That's a difficult question to answer. With my first novel I worry about, for example, whether a character could really travel so quickly between two points in the fantasy world of the novel, but of course the reader probably wouldn't notice (assuming the existence of a reader who isn't me).
My second novel contains so many different elements:
- Is the sex too explicit and anyway unnecessary?
- Are the characters drawn well enough and is the romance believable?
- Are the historical references a little too lecture-y?
- Will everyone really hate the ending too much to understand that writing it broke my heart?

I have to admit its sometimes hard to criticise your own work like that - when you write a book you end up editing it so much because you find those weaknesses in it from the first draft but saying that you still sit there thinking - should I have done this or would it have been better to have done that?
In the end a writer can think so many things about their book, but if they did it constantly nothing would ever get published.
I can say I'm not happy about my character development sometimes - but that doesn't mean the reader wont. Sub plots I can never get these right at times or at least that's what I feel. Like Francis said, is the sex too explicit and anyway unnecessary?
I could probably go at this all day but in the end, I prefer hearing from the readers - that's where you learn you go wrong and where to develop yourself further - or at least that's what I think!

Over active imagination is not always a bad thing - let it flow ... that's what editing is for!



(Begin rant...)
It's very irritating, though, when there hasn't been any attempt to edit. I'm not talking about a professional service, just persuading a friend to read it, running it through a spelling & grammar checker, etc.
Simple things: it's / its, they're / their, you're / your
Missing a stop at the end or forgetting a capital letter at the start are practically crimes.
And please don't use colons and semicolons unless you know what they're for!
I don't like to be a pedant, but how can a writer convey meaning when the reader is tripping over the syntax all the time?
(End rant...)
I'm a lot less forgiving of my own writing than I am of other people's...

While it would be nice if they made me rich and famous (ha ha ha ha) I don't really care about that. What's really important to me is that people enjoy reading my books.
My mum has read one, but otherwise I have no idea whether anyone else has read either completely.


Your thoughts?



While it would be nice if they made me rich and famous (ha ha ha ha) I don't really care about that. What's really important to me is that peop..."
I loved your comment about loving your novels dearly.
It should really be enough, shouldn't it?
I love my book, and my characters with such a passion; they, and the process of bringing them fully to life, is so seductive to me.
But I have two big fears: one--that for some reason I will never finish my book, and it will never get published.
two---that I DO finish my book, and it gets published.
Because, then what? I suppose I just keep writing.
I can't lie and say that fame and riches wouldn't be nice. But my goals are these: I want to write something meaningful to add to the vampire genre, ie. not fluff. I know there are loftier ambitions humans should aspire to, but there it is.
And I have always thought that the very definition of success is that you can live, and live well, by what you yourself have created. That is what successful authors have that I want. That freedom to live your life that way. I'm sure, no matter how famous and successful, they are plagued with insecurites, deadlines, worries, like everyone else. But I'd gladly take those on.

I agree with you about wanting to say something meaningful. After finishing my first book I had lots of ideas for how to fit in prequels and sequels, but never found the passion to take these ideas and forge something out of them.
Twelve years later, stuck in a hotel room, I thought I'd amuse myself by writing something, nothing particular in my head. I didn't expect it to go anywhere. But it got me thinking: What would life really have been like over the centuries for a female vampire?
At around the same time there were two series on TV. Bettany Hughes looking at women and the divine across history:
http://www.bettanyhughes.co.uk/divine...
and Lucy Worsley's Harlots, Housewives and Heroines, about women in the seventeenth century:
http://www.silverriver.tv/broadcast/g...
Also, while trying to think of an interesting origin story, I read Infamous Lady: The True Story of Countess Erzsébet Báthory and was left with a serious dose of life-darker-than-fiction.
So, anyway, what started as a light-hearted amusement, evolved rapidly into what might best be described as an anti-genre feminist rant.
God save us all from authors with a message... :-)

Can mystery be over done? I wonder about this. In real life not everything has an explanation. But in books, does a reader need/demand that all the loose ends be tied up and explained satisfactorily; or is it acceptable to leave some of the mystery hanging; let the reader draw their own conclusions, or continue to wonder; or would the reader think "this writer is lazy or careless and didn't bother to sort this out for us."

I saw a ballet production called Blood Countess that was actually very well done. I had read the book years ago also. One tends to see her portrayed as a vampire because of her blood fetish. Meh. I guess so. There was a fabulous book out years ago (and a horrible film made of it, with a good cast except for the lead...I'd see anything with Alan Rickman in it...anyway the book was Perfume. The character was a vampire of scent--the thing he lacked that separated him from humans. Though the word vampire is never used as I recall it is so obviously one of the better interpretations of vampires ever, and remains one of my favorite books for that reason. It proves you can interpret the vampire mythology in new and different ways.


As for the short story I already published (that is posted on my profile), some changes that I agree with have already been suggested: I didn't stay in the head of my viewpoint character enough. From the beginning, I made some comments as a narrator that were more distant and melodramatic than my character's direct thoughts would have been. (Feel free to read and comment on it yourselves; the more good advice I get, the more I should be able to re-write it better when I have the chance. It's called "Blood Ties.")
I haven't yet read everyone's comments on this question; I want to get back to my writing, and it's 12:25 a.m. I enjoy my time on here, but if I want to finish my novel and my education, etc., I can't do all I'd like to here. My characters are calling me...


For me (and many others, I'm sure), writing is a process of discovery as much as creation. Sometimes I set out to write the plot in one direction, but the characters take off in some other completely unexpected direction.
There's a key difference between series and and standalone books that has a huge impact on how the reader reacts to the end of the book. In a series, the author can leave all sorts of things unsaid and unexplained, and the reader will wait to see how the next book picks these up. Which is fine, but does add a touch of soap opera, especially in long series.
With a standalone book, the reader has a fixed ending and can only speculate what the characters do next.
I wrote Suzie and the Monsters as a standalone. I got quite obsessed with it at times, and researching and writing it ate a lot of time that I couldn't really afford. For the next half-year I have even less spare time, but I have an aching desire to pick up the threads and continue the story.



Just keep hanging in there Robin. Everything will work out,in the long run.

Right now I am going through chapters I haven't worked on in 3 years, reading each one over in order and making changes as needed, but I'm getting eager to get to the hard part where I have to write new material. I just want everything to be set up and clear in my head before I go there again, especially since those gap areas are where I got stuck before. Some of them are parts that don't interest me, and so I'm thinking about cutting what I can because it may not be of interest to the reader, either. Some of the scenes I planned might be just mentioned in dialog or something if they aren't that crucial.

Hmmm. I would define the age of twilight fans as more of a social phenomenon than as a true age range, in that: young girls, pre-teens and high school maybe, seemed to be the initial readers of this book series. Then, somehow the Moms got on board. I began seeing the book everywhere, in the hands of people you would least expect to be interested. Then, the young girls--got older, went to high school/college--and that seemed to leave just the Moms lusting after Edward/Jacob. I really don't get this.
I went on a vampire themed cruise this summer; it was supposed to be for the serious vampire fans, but there was a very small turnout for this. Whereas the "sparkling" variety of vampire fans had 600 on board for the previous years cruise. I would hate to be in that crowd for reasons too numerous to mention.
As for Anne Rice, love her or hate her and her work, --- every true fan of vampires knows her work to some extent. Her contribution to vampire literature is indisputable.








It's funny, I crawled out of bed this morning because my alarm clock said 7.20, and staggered sleepily downstairs, thinking how dark it was... and discovered that it was only 6.20. Somehow my bedroom is in another time zone.

Anyway, good morning, all! Yes, Francis, you were up late on here, like I was, too. Maybe your bedroom is in the Twilight Zone. *play the music* One morning, I got my daughter up for school when I thought it was time, and I couldn't get her to get going, she was so groggy. I was really mean to her until I discovered I'd read the clock wrong and it was still the wee hours of the morning.
Now that I am The Illustrated Woman, I am feeling tired, too.
Inspiration gives me energy? I haven't thought much on that. It makes sense. But I have to confess that until recently (and even now sometimes), those late nights have been spent playing games and chatting with people that turn up on Facebook rather than writing or getting ideas for writing.


iters, and vampires, and AR fans; just the people I need to connect with. How might others of you market your book/reach your audience?

Which is not to say that pre-marketing isn't a good thing. I'm very impressed with Faye's blog and artwork, for example.
I want to ask how your novel is coming along, but... is that bad etiquette?
Substitute Novel for PhD/Thesis in these:
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archi...
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archi...
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archi...
and my favourite:
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archi...

I will not be wearing glass slippers. They are so uncomfortable, and hard to write on! I will wear my embroidered canvass flats that have "Here comes the sun" on them. And boy, my make-up has been smearing! I will probably have to do it all over again Saturday, especially since I need that bath.

I think Grimm said the shoes were pure gold (which still sounds unlikely).
Anyway, have fun at the ball!
Books mentioned in this topic
Suzie and the Monsters: A Fairytale of Blood, Sex and Inhumanity (other topics)Suzie and the Monsters: A Fairytale of Blood, Sex and Inhumanity (other topics)
Shrouds of Darkness (other topics)
Occupation (other topics)
Hannibal (other topics)
More...
Looking at your work objectively, what would you say, or imagine, the biggest criticism of your work would be? Ie: characters too weak/shallow; plot stretches credulity; main character(s)too good or too evil (not enough balance); book too long; focus of the book unclear....etc.