Bernard Lewis Books
Showing 1-20 of 20

by (shelved 6 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 4.16 — 444 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 5 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.81 — 2,438 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 5 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.68 — 3,489 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 4 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.55 — 3,904 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 3 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.73 — 445 ratings — published 1950

by (shelved 3 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.75 — 307 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 3 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.66 — 97 ratings — published 1968

by (shelved 2 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.93 — 445 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 2 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.77 — 257 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.73 — 1,625 ratings — published 1967

by (shelved 2 times as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.63 — 288 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.64 — 152 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.76 — 131 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.61 — 227 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.60 — 43 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.95 — 189 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.98 — 112 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.50 — 117 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.72 — 167 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 1 time as bernard-lewis)
avg rating 3.80 — 262 ratings — published 2004

“Edward genially enough did not disagree with what I said, but he didn't seem to admit my point, either. I wanted to press him harder so I veered close enough to the ad hominem to point out that his life—the life of the mind, the life of the book collector and music lover and indeed of the gallery-goer, appreciator of the feminine and occasional boulevardier—would become simply unlivable and unthinkable in an Islamic republic. Again, he could accede politely to my point but carry on somehow as if nothing had been conceded. I came slowly to realize that with Edward, too, I was keeping two sets of books. We agreed on things like the first Palestinian intifadah, another event that took the Western press completely off guard, and we collaborated on a book of essays that asserted and defended Palestinian rights. This was in the now hard-to-remember time when all official recognition was withheld from the PLO. Together we debated Professor Bernard Lewis and Leon Wieseltier at a once-celebrated conference of the Middle East Studies Association in Cambridge in 1986, tossing and goring them somewhat in a duel over academic 'objectivity' in the wider discipline. But even then I was indistinctly aware that Edward didn't feel himself quite at liberty to say certain things, while at the same time feeling rather too much obliged to say certain other things. A low point was an almost uncritical profile of Yasser Arafat that he contributed to Interview magazine in the late 1980s.”
― Hitch 22: A Memoir
― Hitch 22: A Memoir

“The medieval European, who shared the fundamental assumptions of his Muslim contemporary, would have agreed with him in ascribing religious movements to religious causes, and would have sought no further for an explanation. But when Europeans ceased to accord first place to religion in their thoughts, sentiments, interests, and loyalties, they also ceased to admit that other men, in other times and places, could have done so. To a rationalistic and materialistic generation, it was inconceivable that such great debates and mighty conflicts could have involved no more than ‘merely’ religious issues. And so historians, once they had passed the stage of amused contempt, devised a series of explanations, setting forth for what they described as the ‘real’ or 'ultimate’ significance 'underlying’ religious movements and differences. The clashes and squabbles of the early churches, the great Schism, the Reformation, all were reinterpreted in terms of motives and interests reasonable by the standards of the day—and for religious movements of Islam too explanations were found that tallied with the outlook and interests of the finders.”
― Islam in History: Ideas, People, and Events in the Middle East
― Islam in History: Ideas, People, and Events in the Middle East