Belhor’s review of Lying > Likes and Comments

14 likes · 
Comments Showing 1-12 of 12 (12 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kevin (new)

Kevin Cole I think you must make a better argument than he does.


message 2: by Belhor (new)

Belhor Crowley Kevin wrote: "I think you must make a better argument than he does."

He doesn't make much of an argument. It's basically lying is bad and yes you have to pay a price when you tell the truth but it's always worth it!
This isn't an argument. It's a statement. The book is too short to contain any arguments. I can't counter this. My problem is that there are many questions unanswered.


message 3: by Kevin (new)

Kevin Cole Here's my statement: Telling the truth is not always worth it ;-)


message 4: by Belhor (new)

Belhor Crowley Kevin wrote: "Here's my statement: Telling the truth is not always worth it ;-)"

Oh, I think I misinterpreted your first comment then. :|
sorry about that. My bad. :D

Yes, that's what I'm saying. And plus it's a very complex philosophic subject; I mean morality, ethics, epistemology, utilitarianism, etc... not even one of them is considered here.
Telling the truth is usually not worth it. :D
And there's a reason for that. There's a mechanism to this system and a reason for its existence.


message 5: by Nate (new)

Nate Thank you for pointing out that the individual does not agree, and therefore does not owe, an explanation to someone simply because s/he is asked. When I step out the door, I will invariably come across people to whom I've made no agreements about my telling them the truth. They are not friends, co-workers, bosses, family. I have no social relationship to them other than that we are both humans. When they ask a question about me, I do be owe them the truth. Lying is my right because they have no absolute right to my information. Lying gets a lot of fried, but it makes the world more bearable for many people.


message 6: by Belhor (new)

Belhor Crowley Nate wrote: "Thank you for pointing out that the individual does not agree, and therefore does not owe, an explanation to someone simply because s/he is asked. When I step out the door, I will invariably come ..."

Thank you Nate. :)
I also agree that lying is a necessity.


message 7: by Amir (new)

Amir Tesla Having read the "free will" and your review I no longer desire to put time on any of his books. They're too shallow it seems.


message 8: by Belhor (new)

Belhor Crowley Amir wrote: "Having read the "free will" and your review I no longer desire to put time on any of his books. They're too shallow it seems."

I hope he's got some other things to do with his life, because when it comes to philosophy, he's not all that good.
He is, as you said, too shallow.
I also gave up on him after I read two of his books.


message 9: by Amir (new)

Amir Tesla :))
Yeah dude, it was disappointing.


message 10: by Paul (new)

Paul Brandel Well I do believe in being honest. But yes there are times when lying a good thing. For ex., lying to the Gestapo to save the Jews. Also your girlfriend asks about her weight, no honey you're not fat!


message 11: by Paul (new)

Paul Brandel One more okay lie, to protect your job.
Or one's family.


message 12: by Belhor (new)

Belhor Crowley Paul wrote: "Well I do believe in being honest. But yes there are times when lying a good thing. For ex., lying to the Gestapo to save the Jews. Also your girlfriend asks about her weight, no honey you're not fat!"

I also believe it's good not to lie. I mean even from a utilitarian point of view. I don't really believe there's anything inherently good or bad. But in the long run, I believe it's always better to tell the truth. There are very few circumstances when lying can be logically justified, such as some of the examples you provided.


back to top