Poll

Do you believe genius-level intelligence is primarily the result of nature (genes) or nurture (education, environment, parenting etc)?
Both are equally important
Nature
Nurture
Unsure
56 total votes
Poll added by: James
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Stephen
(new)
Apr 02, 2015 07:05AM

reply
|
flag

That's correct Stephen - but recent articles and books I've read from neuroscientists indicate they disagree over whether his brain was different to most due to his genetic make-up OR things he did during his life...or a combination of both.
Einstein did a lot of radical things (mental techniques etc) during the course of his life. So I guess the only way to know for sure would be to have a scan of his brain at birth (or shortly after) to see if he was also vastly different to most at that point as well.




That's terrible. I'm sorry to hear about your childhood.


I agree with Donna on the issue of nutrition...just like any other part of the body, the brain needs proper nourishment to function...
Nurture is a tough one...a gray area in my opinion. A nurturing environment for the average child, may not be the proper environment for a highly intelligent child. How do we determine the influence of nurture? Nature seems more measurable.

..."
Nurture does not relate to the word nurturing in this instance. It has a different meaning relating to things like education, environment, parenting - so it's "nurturing" a child to greatness.
Nurture (as opposed to nature aka genes) could also include random things in a child's/adult's life. For example, the head injuries you mentioned relating to psychopaths also apply to geniuses...Many cases of geniuses have involved people of average intelligence suffering a head injury which somehow activated dormant parts of the brain and made them geniuses.