Home
My Books
Browse ▾
Recommendations
Choice Awards
Genres
Giveaways
New Releases
Lists
Explore
News & Interviews
Genres
Art
Biography
Business
Children's
Christian
Classics
Comics
Cookbooks
Ebooks
Fantasy
Fiction
Graphic Novels
Historical Fiction
History
Horror
Memoir
Music
Mystery
Nonfiction
Poetry
Psychology
Romance
Science
Science Fiction
Self Help
Sports
Thriller
Travel
Young Adult
More Genres
Community ▾
Groups
Quotes
Ask the Author
Sign In
Join
Sign up
View profile
Profile
Friends
Groups
Discussions
Comments
Reading Challenge
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Quotes
Favorite genres
Friends’ recommendations
Account settings
Help
Sign out
Home
My Books
Browse ▾
Recommendations
Choice Awards
Genres
Giveaways
New Releases
Lists
Explore
News & Interviews
Genres
Art
Biography
Business
Children's
Christian
Classics
Comics
Cookbooks
Ebooks
Fantasy
Fiction
Graphic Novels
Historical Fiction
History
Horror
Memoir
Music
Mystery
Nonfiction
Poetry
Psychology
Romance
Science
Science Fiction
Self Help
Sports
Thriller
Travel
Young Adult
More Genres
Community ▾
Groups
Quotes
Ask the Author
poll:
Myself and the other mods have been surprised at the enthusiasm members have shown for the 'one time only' genre specific review rounds that have been set up for the 100th group celebration.
Which leads to the question, should the group move to genre specific rounds?
The downsides are that some genre rounds, especially more 'niche' ones might be difficult to fill, and after a few groups, organising non-reciprocal reviews, if the same people join over and over again, could be problematic.
Upsides would be that authors could be confident that their reviewers understand their genre.
As always, groups are set up when we have mods willing and available. Some mods only mod one group at a time, so instead of a 'general' group being set up every couple of weeks, you could wait months for another group in your specific genre.
The number/types of rounds we can run depends on the number of mods, their availability and their willingness to mod a particular group.
—> people who voted for:
Both.
Showing 31-60 of 62
Maggy
23 books
1 friend
voted for:
Both.
Warren
286 books
168 friends
voted for:
Both.
V.M.
363 books
131 friends
voted for:
Both.
Vera
812 books
5 friends
voted for:
Both.
Ronesa
227 books
0 friends
voted for:
Both.
John
175 books
8 friends
voted for:
Both.
Neil
224 books
43 friends
voted for:
Both.
S.T.
137 books
74 friends
voted for:
Both.
Kris
777 books
72 friends
voted for:
Both.
Mike
825 books
212 friends
voted for:
Both.
Lisa
550 books
679 friends
voted for:
Both.
Mary
368 books
322 friends
voted for:
Both.
Lisa
384 books
164 friends
voted for:
Both.
Kate
76 books
9 friends
voted for:
Both.
Lana
314 books
1771 friends
voted for:
Both.
Scott
508 books
275 friends
voted for:
Both.
J.
132 books
54 friends
voted for:
Both.
Rose
4948 books
74 friends
voted for:
Both.
E.G.
2210 books
119 friends
voted for:
Both.
Amelia
196 books
691 friends
voted for:
Both.
Melanie
331 books
82 friends
voted for:
Both.
E.P.
592 books
344 friends
voted for:
Both.
Donte
371 books
61 friends
voted for:
Both.
K.A.
325 books
147 friends
voted for:
Both.
Jennifer
522 books
65 friends
voted for:
Both.
Maggie
410 books
41 friends
voted for:
Both.
Maggie
206 books
105 friends
voted for:
Both.
Lisa
2439 books
213 friends
voted for:
Both.
Bonmedo
47 books
277 friends
voted for:
Both.
Ash
471 books
23 friends
voted for:
Both.
« previous
1
2
3
next »
all voters
back to poll »
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.