Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between April 28 - June 18, 2020
48%
Flag icon
the source of the problem:
48%
Flag icon
weak marketing leadership at the top.
48%
Flag icon
needs a discipline that is embedded in the people process,
48%
Flag icon
Most people know someone in their organization who doesn’t perform well, yet manages to keep his job year after year.
48%
Flag icon
leader doesn’t have the emotional fortitude
48%
Flag icon
Such failures can do considerable damage ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
48%
Flag icon
He missed his first year’s financial commitments. He lost market share, and the cost structure of his operation became uncompetitive.
48%
Flag icon
Stan did not close plants, cut costs, or focus on execution.
48%
Flag icon
CEO took no ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
49%
Flag icon
Then Stan missed the second year’s targets.
49%
Flag icon
But the move came too late to save the company.
49%
Flag icon
Within six months, it was taken over.
49%
Flag icon
The CEO was very bright, a man of high integrity, always willing to give people the benefit of the doubt.
49%
Flag icon
But he lacked the courage to confront poor performers, or force plant...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
49%
Flag icon
hold him accountable for his poor performance.
49%
Flag icon
A captive of his psychological comfort and blind loyalty,
49%
Flag icon
Howard would not replace them. Before the year was over, the board removed him and his team.
49%
Flag icon
When the right people are not in the right jobs, the problem is visible and transparent.
49%
Flag icon
But the foundation of a great company is the way it develops people—providing
50%
Flag icon
If you spend the same amount of time and energy developing people as you do on budgeting, strategic planning, and financial monitoring, the payoff will come in sustainable competitive advantage.
50%
Flag icon
They don’t ask the most important question: How good is this person at getting things done?
50%
Flag icon
But if you want to build a company that has excellent discipline of execution, you have to select the doer.
50%
Flag icon
lower IQ but who is absolutely determined to succeed, you’ll always do better with the second person.
50%
Flag icon
You can easily spot the doers by observing their working habits. They’re the ones who energize people, are decisive on tough issues, get things done through others, and follow through as second nature.
50%
Flag icon
and strategic planning.
50%
Flag icon
Some leaders drain energy from people and others create it.
51%
Flag icon
just sits there. Sometimes people like that just don’t interview well, and if he’s had great
51%
Flag icon
The leaders whose visions come true build and sustain their people’s momentum.
51%
Flag icon
Deeply involved in all aspects of his business, he is curious and tireless—the
51%
Flag icon
He never finishes a conversation without summarizing the actions to be taken.
51%
Flag icon
Decisiveness is the ability to make difficult decisions swiftly and well, and act on them.
51%
Flag icon
Some leaders simply do not have the emotional fortitude
51%
Flag icon
to confront the to...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
51%
Flag icon
procrasti...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
51%
Flag icon
Few tough issues are more challenging for indecisive
51%
Flag icon
leaders than dealing with people they’ve promoted who are not performing.
52%
Flag icon
indecisive and not an energizer.
52%
Flag icon
Getting things done through others is a fundamental leadership skill.
52%
Flag icon
if you can’t do it, you’re not leading.
52%
Flag icon
They’re the micromanagers, insecure leaders who can’t trust others to get it right because they don’t know how to calibrate them and monitor their performance.
52%
Flag icon
They believe wholeheartedly in delegating:
52%
Flag icon
Some people are just temperamentally unable to work well with others.
52%
Flag icon
He was smart, articulate, and extremely appealing in the way he worked with his superiors.
52%
Flag icon
He was abrasive—”almost a drill sergeant,”
52%
Flag icon
He didn’t include others in decision making.
52%
Flag icon
People who can’t work with others reduce the capacities of their organizations.
52%
Flag icon
Follow-through is the cornerstone of execution,
52%
Flag icon
religiously.
52%
Flag icon
Following through ensures that people are doing the things they committed to do, accordin...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
53%
Flag icon
Never finish a meeting without clarifying what the follow-through will be, who will do it, when and how they will do it, what resources they will use, and how and when the next review will take place and with whom.
1 8 18