(Isn’t a moral philosopher the opposite of a Puritan? Namely, insofar as he is a thinker who considers morality questionable, as calling for question marks, in short as a problem? Should moralizing not be—immoral?)
I get why moralizing should immoral. But I don’t get why a moral philosopher should be immoral. to know both sides? I know there's research saying that moral philosophers are less moral. I had a podcast talk bout that research.
