The idea of natural selection is not hard to grasp. If individuals within a species differ genetically from one another, and some of those differences affect an individual’s ability to survive and reproduce in its environment, then in the next generation the “good” genes that lead to higher survival and reproduction will have relatively more copies than the “not so good” genes.
Ok, wow, a pretty good definition of natural selection...so maybe he does understand it...so why is it wrong everywhere else in his book? He wouldn't be using some truth with non-truth would he? Not on purpose! Surely not.
