Why Evolution Is True
Rate it:
Open Preview
59%
Flag icon
speciation would be very rare indeed. But it isn’t. Given that a single plant can produce millions of eggs and pollen grains, an improbable event eventually becomes probable.
59%
Flag icon
a quarter of all species of flowering plants were formed via polyploidy.
59%
Flag icon
a new polyploid species can arise in just two generations.
59%
Flag icon
the Welsh groundsel represents a new species that arose in the last hundred years.
61%
Flag icon
As Linnaeus proposed, our anatomy places us in the order Primates along with monkeys, apes, and lemurs, all sharing traits such as forward-facing eyes, fingernails, color vision, and opposable thumbs.
61%
Flag icon
within the Hominoidea we are grouped with the great apes in the family Hominidae, sharing unique features like flattened fingernails, thirty-two teeth, enlarged ovaries, and prolonged parental care.
61%
Flag icon
Molecular data derived from DNA and protein sequences confirms these relationships, and also tells us roughly when we diverged from our relatives.
61%
Flag icon
we diverged from our joint common ancestor about seven million years ago.
61%
Flag icon
we share 98.5 percent of our DNA sequence with chimps,
62%
Flag icon
Sahelanthropus tchadensis,
62%
Flag icon
between six and seven million years ago, right when molecular evidence tells us that our lineage diverged from that of chimps.
62%
Flag icon
Orrorin tugenensis,
62%
Flag icon
australopithecines,
63%
Flag icon
One could not ask for a better transitional form between humans and ancient apes than Lucy.
63%
Flag icon
our upright posture evolved long before our big brain.
63%
Flag icon
In many respects A. afarensis is intermediate between the apelike and human morphology.
63%
Flag icon
A. rudolfensis, appear so intermediate in brain size that scientists argue hotly about whether they should be called Homo or Australopithecus.
63%
Flag icon
(Modern humans, for example, span a very wide range: between 1,000 and 2,000 cubic centimeters, which doesn’t, by the way, correlate with intelligence.)
63%
Flag icon
The first unequivocally tool-using human was Homo habilis (figure 25), whose remains first appear about 2.5 million years ago.
64%
Flag icon
These bumps raise the possibility—still far from certain—that habilis was the first species with spoken language.
64%
Flag icon
H. erectus (“upright man”) holds the distinction of being the first hominin to leave Africa:
64%
Flag icon
the brain size of erectus was nearly equal to that of modern humans.
64%
Flag icon
(the chin is a hallmark of modern H. sapiens).
64%
Flag icon
The species also seems responsible for one of the most momentous events in human cultural history: the control of fire.
64%
Flag icon
Neanderthals ceremonially buried their dead: perhaps the first inkling of human religion.
64%
Flag icon
about 60,000 years ago, every H. erectus population suddenly vanished and was replaced by fossils of “anatomically modern” H. sapiens, who had skeletons nearly identical to those of living humans.
65%
Flag icon
Recent analysis of fossil wrist bones, however, do support H. floresiensis as a genuine species of hominin,
65%
Flag icon
It’s always easier to document evolutionary change than to understand the forces behind it.
65%
Flag icon
Lowly Origin,
65%
Flag icon
the first tool appeared around the time that brains started getting larger.
65%
Flag icon
Even without fossils, we have evidence of human evolution from comparative anatomy, embryology, our vestigial traits, and even biogeography.
65%
Flag icon
We’ve learned of our fishlike embryos, our dead genes, our transitory fetal coat of hair, and our poor design, all testifying to our origins. The fossil record is really the icing on the cake.
66%
Flag icon
There are over fourteen hundred novel genes expressed in humans but not in chimps.
66%
Flag icon
The Mismeasure of Man,
66%
Flag icon
Races (also called “subspecies” or “ecotypes”) are simply populations of a species that are both geographically separated and differ genetically in one or more traits.
66%
Flag icon
The existence of different races in humans shows that our populations were geographically separated long enough to allow some genetic divergence to occur.
67%
Flag icon
the cultural change can also produce genetic change.
68%
Flag icon
The DNA data shows that, overall, genetic differences among human populations are minor.
68%
Flag icon
The evolution of lactose tolerance is another splendid example of gene-culture coevolution.
68%
Flag icon
It turns out that tolerant individuals must have produced, on average, 4 to 10 percent more offspring than those who were intolerant. That is pretty strong selection.
68%
Flag icon
there is one mutant gene—an allele called CCR5-Δ32—that provides its carriers with strong protection against infection with the AIDS virus.
69%
Flag icon
nearly every species has genetic variation to respond to nearly any form of selection.
69%
Flag icon
with all these exalted powers—Man still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.
69%
Flag icon
you can see fossils in any natural history museum,
69%
Flag icon
Every fossil that we find, every DNA molecule that we sequence, every organ system that we dissect supports the idea that species evolved from common ancestors.
70%
Flag icon
There is no dissent among serious biologists about the major claims of evolutionary theory—only about the details of how evolution occurred, and about the relative roles of various evolutionary mechanisms.
70%
Flag icon
A science without controversy is a science without progress.
70%
Flag icon
To these folks, evolution raises such profound questions of purpose, morality, and meaning that they just can’t accept it no matter how much evidence they see. It’s not that we evolved from apes that bothers them so much; it’s the emotional consequences of facing that fact. And unless we address those concerns, we won’t progress in making evolution a universally acknowledged truth.
70%
Flag icon
Now, science cannot completely exclude the possibility of supernatural explanation. It is possible— though very unlikely—that our whole world is controlled by elves. But supernatural explanations like these are simply never needed: we manage to understand the natural world just fine using reason and materialism. Furthermore, supernatural explanations always mean the end of inquiry: that’s the way God wants it, end of story. Science, on the other hand, is never satisfied: our studies of the universe will continue until humans go extinct.
70%
Flag icon
Godless: The Church of Liberalism,