The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance
Rate it:
1%
Flag icon
the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which erected a high wall between commercial banking (making loans and accepting deposits) and investment banking (issuing stocks and bonds).
1%
Flag icon
In 1935, J. P. Morgan and Company chose to remain a commercial bank and spun off Morgan Stanley, an investment house.
2%
Flag icon
merchant bankers who traded in dry goods and also financed such trade; hence, their businesses became known as merchant banks.
2%
Flag icon
British investors cursed America as a land of cheats, rascals, and ingrates.
2%
Flag icon
Peabody was constantly exposed to the fierce snobbery of British aristocrats toward the American commercial class.
2%
Flag icon
he mostly hoarded his money in preparation for the next panic.
2%
Flag icon
Junius Morgan, who became Peabody’s partner in 1854,
2%
Flag icon
he spent only about $3,000 of a total annual income of $300,000.
2%
Flag icon
American grain prices soared during the Crimean War, and western railroads that transported grain boomed as well, creating a mania for their shares. Railroads devoured vast amounts of capital, and in the decade before the Civil War, investors poured $1 billion into their development, triple any former commitment.
2%
Flag icon
Wheat prices tumbled with the end of the Crimean War, causing hardship for American banks and railroads.
2%
Flag icon
Ever since Andrew Jackson killed the second Bank of the United States in 1832, the United States lacked a uniform currency.
2%
Flag icon
His later tolerance for the proposed Federal Reserve System has often been traced to this early Bank of England bailout of his father’s firm.
2%
Flag icon
slow &, sure should be the motto of every young man.”
3%
Flag icon
“When the streets of Paris are running with blood, I buy.”
3%
Flag icon
the Morgans’ political impulses would mesh perfectly with profitable opportunities.
4%
Flag icon
the line between finance and commerce would blur until much of industry passed under the control of the bankers.
4%
Flag icon
The idea was not to compete, at least not too openly. This meant no advertising, no price competition, and no raiding of other firms’ clients.
4%
Flag icon
bankers acquired such power because many governments in wartime lacked the sophisticated tax machinery to sustain the fighting.
4%
Flag icon
London banks didn’t lend their own funds but would organize large-scale bond issues.
4%
Flag icon
perfect mesh between merchant banks and statecraft? As private partnerships, these small banks were free of prying depositors or shareholders and could indulge their political biases.
4%
Flag icon
“Never under any circumstances do an action which could be called in question if known to the world.”
5%
Flag icon
In 1873, Washington decided to refund, at lower interest rates, the $300 million in bonded debt remaining from the Civil War.
Charles Ayers
Re-fund. Pay off with lower interest debt.
5%
Flag icon
When grain prices fell after the Franco-Prussian war, the fortunes of the Northern Pacific and other railroads fell along with them.
Charles Ayers
Transport follows industry and commodities
5%
Flag icon
debilitated by the Northern Pacific, the mighty house of Jay Cooke failed on Black Thursday, September 18, 1873.
5%
Flag icon
The failure ignited a full-blown Wall Street panic.
5%
Flag icon
“the financial crash of September 1873 had been as memorable a landmark as, to the community of half a century later, was the panic of October 1929.”
5%
Flag icon
With Jay Cooke conveniently wiped off the map, Drexel, Morgan stood, with miraculous suddenness, at the apex of American government finance.
5%
Flag icon
the 1873 panic ushered in a period of extended deflation and depression,
5%
Flag icon
Junius’s injunction to “remember one thing always. . . . Always be a ‘bull’ on America.”
5%
Flag icon
Pierpont decided to limit his future dealings to elite companies.
5%
Flag icon
Morgan strategy—dealing only with the strongest companies and shying away from speculative ventures.
5%
Flag icon
He wouldn’t haggle and presented his bids for foreign exchange on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
5%
Flag icon
he had trouble delegating authority and low regard for the intelligence of other people.
5%
Flag icon
“The longer I live the more apparent becomes the absence of brains
6%
Flag icon
Commodore Vanderbilt’s death was a pivotal moment in the shift of business from family to public ownership
6%
Flag icon
the Commodore bequeathed to his oldest son, William Henry, 87 percent of New York Central stock.
6%
Flag icon
The Commodore had merged eleven small railroads to form the forty-five-hundred-mile New York Central.
6%
Flag icon
Several commentators have noted Pierpont’s “savior complex,”
6%
Flag icon
For Pierpont, a gentleman wasn’t a rich man but a member of a social caste.
6%
Flag icon
he called himself a merchant and his firm a countinghouse.
6%
Flag icon
arch enemy of the House of Morgan—Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
7%
Flag icon
for Pierpont the Church wasn’t an active, reforming spirit, but a repository of ancient beauty, powerful because it was archaic and unchanging.
7%
Flag icon
Extortion artists would lay down parallel lines just to be bought out by an established road.
7%
Flag icon
He had no gift for sustained analysis; his genius was in the brief, sudden brainstorm.
7%
Flag icon
“Morgan has one chief mental asset—a tremendous five minutes’ concentration of thought.”
7%
Flag icon
Morgan reorganized the big Philadelphia and Reading Railroad. This involved issuing new bonds with lower interest rates
7%
Flag icon
The basic weakness with America’s railroad system was overbuilding, which forced the roads into endless rounds of rate cuts and wage cuts to service debt.
7%
Flag icon
Morgan always favored government planning over private competition, but private planning over either.
7%
Flag icon
In 1887, Congress passed the Interstate Commerce Act, the first regulatory commission, which enshrined competition as its guiding principle and eliminated the controversial rebates.
7%
Flag icon
the gentleman’s agreements suffered the historic fate of cartels. They couldn’t control small outside competitors, who cut rates, outflanked larger rivals, and won new business.
« Prev 1 3 7