More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
The appearance of weakness often brings out people’s aggressive side, making them drop strategy and prudence for an emotional and violent attack.
Controlling the front you present to the world is the most critical deceptive skill. People respond most directly to what they see,
you need to present a front that does the opposite—disarms suspicions. The best front here is weakness, which will make the other side feel superior to you,
you should present a face to the world that promises the opposite of what you are actually planning.
Camouflage. The ability to blend into the environment is one of the most terrifying forms of military deception.
The camouflage strategy can be applied to daily life in two ways. First, it is always good to be able to blend into the social landscape, to avoid calling attention to yourself unless you choose to do so.
break the pattern, and take them by surprise.
Planted information. People are much more likely to believe something they see with their own eyes than something they are told.
Your task as a strategist is to know your enemies well, then use your knowledge to contrive a strategy that goes outside their experience. What they might have read or heard about matters less than their personal experience, which dominates their emotional lives and determines their responses.
something with no reference to ordinary life is not in fact unconventional, but merely strange.
When striving to create the extraordinary, always remember: what is crucial is the mental process, not the image or maneuver itself.
What will truly shock and linger long in the mind are those works and ideas that grow out of the soil of the ordinary and banal, that are unexpected, that make us question and contest the very nature of the reality we see around us.
Understand: you cannot win wars without public and political support, but people will balk at joining your side or cause unless it seems righteous and just. And as Luther realized, presenting your cause as just takes strategy and showmanship.
First, it is wise to pick a fight with an enemy that you can portray as authoritarian, hypocritical, and power-hungry. Using all available media, you strike first with a moral offensive against the opponent’s points of vulnerability. You make your language strong and appealing to the masses, and craft it, if you can, to give people the opportunity to express a hostility they already feel.
It is a world not of angels but of angles, where men speak of moral principles but act on power principles; a world where we are always moral and our enemies always immoral. RULES FOR RADICALS, SAUL D. ALINSKY, 1909–1972
First, the moral attack often comes out of left field, having nothing to do with what you imagine the conflict is about.
Second, the attack is often ad hominem; rational argument is met with the emotional and personal. Your character, rather than the issue you are fighting over, becomes the ground of the debate. Your motives are questioned and given the darkest turn.
Appearances and reputation rule in today’s world; letting the enemy frame these things to its liking is akin to letting it take the most favorable position on the battlefield. Once the fight for moral terrain has begun, you must fight to occupy the high ground in the same way you would in a shooting war.
If a fight with your enemies is inevitable, always work to make them start it. In 1861, President Abraham Lincoln maneuvered carefully to make the South shoot first at Fort Sumter, initiating the Civil War.
give them no target. Live up to your good name; practice what you preach, at least in public; ally yourself with the most just causes of the day.
Instead of frontal battles, deliver irritating but damaging side attacks and pinprick bites. Frustrated at their inability to use their strength against your vaporous campaign, your opponents will grow irrational and exhausted.
With his cells in place, Boyd had constant intelligence as to what was going on in the Pentagon and could anticipate the timing and content of the attacks on him. He could also use these cells to spread his influence through word of mouth, infiltrating ever deeper into the bureaucracy. The main point is to avoid an organization’s formal channels and tendency for bigness and concentration.
Always try to ally your guerrilla campaign with a cause you can defend as just and worthy.
The best way to advance your cause with the minimum of effort and bloodshed is to create a constantly shifting network of alliances, getting others to compensate for your deficiencies, do your dirty work, fight your wars, spend energy pulling you forward. The art is in choosing those allies who fit the needs of the moment and fill the gaps in your power. Give them gifts, offer them friendship, help them in time of need—all
forms of reciprocity - for the whole book, create a scale or diagram of urgency versus threat matrix of tactics. Each tactic should cover a range. Use a build if necessary
we sometimes choose those who seem the friendliest, who we think will be loyal. Our emotions lead us astray.
You must think of them as temporary tools. When you no longer need such tools, there is no love lost in dumping them.
A false alliance is created out of an immediate emotional need. It requires that you give up something essential about yourself and makes it impossible for you to make your own decisions.
A true alliance is formed out of mutual self-interest, each side supplying what the other cannot get alone. It does not require you to fuse your own identity with that of a group or pay attention to everyone else’s emotional needs. It allows you autonomy.
you must learn to make these necessary alliances strategic ones, aligning yourself with people who can give you something you cannot get on your own. This requires that you resist the temptation to let your decisions about alliances be governed by your emotions; your emotional needs are what your personal life
he made a point of befriending and allying himself with those at key positions—whether high or low—in the information chain. He was particularly good with older men who enjoyed the company of a lively young man and the role of the father figure giving advice.
He would also seek quick victory in battle, even a small one, for no force is more easily discouraged by a defeat than an allied one.
always look at the tangible benefits you will gain from this alliance. If the benefits seem vague or hard to realize, think twice about joining forces.
wary of people who speak well, have apparently charming personalities, and talk about friendship, loyalty, and selflessness: they are most often con artists trying to prey on your emotions.