The Comanche Empire
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between September 10 - September 18, 2022
36%
Flag icon
Las Siete Leyes.
36%
Flag icon
province, they faced unified resistance that included the vast majority of Anglo colonists and many prominent members of the Tejano elite. In November, delegations from twelve Texas communities met at San Felipe de Austin, declared allegiance to the federalist constitution of 1824, and cut off ties to the centralist regime.
36%
Flag icon
Santa Anna’s centralist government not only disregarded these sentiments but moved ahead with its plan to dissolve state militias, the safeguard of state sovereignty. That plan, if successful, would have left much of Texas wide open to Comanche attacks, and the federal government’s resolve with the issue alienated many Tejano leaders and pushed them to support the revolt.
37%
Flag icon
Comanches’ ascendancy over New Mexico was in many ways a straightforward matter of economic size and reach. Comanchería dwarfed the densely populated but spatially unimposing colony, and Comanches’ thick and far-reaching exchange network isolated New Mexico almost completely from North America’s interior.
37%
Flag icon
Many of their inhabitants were genízaros, who had lived in captivity among the Comanches before being ransomed by New Mexicans. Although nominally Spanish subjects, genízaros often maintained attachments to their former masters.
38%
Flag icon
At the same time that some administrators still entertained plans for the Hispanization of the Comanches, eastern New Mexico was rapidly blending into Comanchería. By the early nineteenth century, Comanche was widely spoken in New Mexico’s eastern frontier, and in such border towns as Taos and San Miguel del Vado one often heard Comanche phrases mixed with Spanish.
38%
Flag icon
the bison hunter, cibolero, was emerging as the cultural embodiment of frontier New Mexico.
38%
Flag icon
1821, Jacob Fowler encountered a “Spanish” comanchero party whose members “were painted like the Indians the day they traded.” Many nineteenth-century observers found it impossible to differentiate ciboleros, comancheros, and Comanches from one another.
38%
Flag icon
New Mexico’s final decade as a Spanish colony was marked by mounting Comanche influence within its borders. As revolutionary spasms gripped the empire’s core areas after 1810, compromising Mexico City’s ability to support the frontier provinces, New Mexico grew increasingly dependent on the Comanches for resources and protection.
38%
Flag icon
This unflinching pro-Comanche stance set New Mexico apart from the other Spanish colonies. While New Mexican communities clung to Comanchería, replicating its culture and economy like a double helix,
38%
Flag icon
Gradually, Comanches divided the vast span of northern New Spain from the Nueces River to the upper Río Grande into distinct zones: they raided in one region, drew tribute in another, traded in the third, and peddled stolen Spanish goods in the fourth.
38%
Flag icon
After having maintained an uninterrupted peace with New Mexico for thirty-five years, Comanches began raiding in the province again. The first flash of violence occurred in August 1821,
38%
Flag icon
It was at this juncture of escalating Comanche violence that New Mexico began to cut loose from Mexico City. The colony had began to turn from central Mexico toward the power and wealth of Comanchería during the late Spanish era, and the rise of the American-dominated Santa Fe trade after 1822 had accelerated that eastern reorientation.
38%
Flag icon
This independent maneuvering ran up against Mexico City’s ambitious nation-building project, which gathered momentum after 1830. In 1835 political power in Mexico City moved from liberal federalists to conservative centralists, a momentous shift that immediately sparked a secessionist revolt in Texas and a federalist revolt in California. New Mexico followed suit in August 1837 when an armed rebellion erupted in Río Arriba.
38%
Flag icon
the Chimayó Rebellion was a full-fledged popular revolt against the centralists’ plans to impose direct national taxation and introduce nationwide religious reforms.
38%
Flag icon
The repression of the Chimayó movement, together with Mexico’s loss of Texas a year before, resulted in an outpouring of patriotic rhetoric in New Mexico and launched a nationalist campaign to preserve Catholicism and the Mexican culture.
39%
Flag icon
In 1844 a Comanche delegation visited Santa Fe and told Mariano Martínez, now governor of New Mexico, that three hundred Comanche warriors were about to invade Chihuahua.
39%
Flag icon
New Mexican elites had been forced to choose between appeasing one of two imperial cores and, in more cases than not, they chose Comanchería.
39%
Flag icon
serve as agents of capitalist expansion,
39%
Flag icon
On March 2, 1836, at Washington-on-the-Brazos, delegates from more than forty Texas communities voted to separate from Mexico.
39%
Flag icon
at the time the declaration of independence occurred, General Antonio López de Santa Anna was besieging the San Antonio garrison with more than two thousand troops.
39%
Flag icon
May 14, Santa Anna signed the Treaty of Velasco, in which he recognized the independence of Texas and promised to withdraw Mexican troops below the Río Grande.
39%
Flag icon
The government of Mexico refused to ratify the treaty and continued the war for nine more years,
39%
Flag icon
The Republic of Texas was a political anomaly, an independent nation that did not expect—or much want—to remain as such. Anticipating fast annexation by the United States, it kept its eastern border open and took in thousands of American immigrants each year.
39%
Flag icon
Unlike most prominent Texan officials, Houston, who had married a mixed-blood Cherokee woman and lived for years in Indian Territory, believed that Texas could have peace only if the republic made concessions to Indian nations.
39%
Flag icon
To solve the Indian problem, Lamar recruited nine companies of mounted volunteers and rangers, which routed the Cherokees, Shawnees, Delawares, and Kickapoos north of the Red River.
39%
Flag icon
Waterloo (soon to be renamed Austin) at the fringes of Comanche
39%
Flag icon
Texas launched a genocidal war against the Comanches. The first non-Indians to bring the war to Comanchería since Juan Bautista de Anza’s invasion in 1779, Lamar’s soldiers hunted down Comanche bands, often indiscriminately killing men, women, and children. Comanches retaliated by razing farms, slaughtering cattle, seizing captives, and killing settlers and mutilating their bodies.
39%
Flag icon
In January 1840, after a destructive smallpox epidemic swept Comanchería, Comanches sued for peace and sent representatives to San Antonio.
39%
Flag icon
Meanwhile, Texas Secretary of War Albert Sidney Johnston
39%
Flag icon
In the following weeks Comanches exchanged Anglo and Mexican captives for their own in San Antonio, but the massacre had left them distraught and enraged.
39%
Flag icon
By the winter, most Comanches had retreated north, leaving thousands of square miles open for settlers from Texas.
39%
Flag icon
Lamar’s three-year campaign had taken countless lives, drained the republic’s treasury, and ruined its credit.
40%
Flag icon
It was a demand that no Texas official could concede, for Texas law did not recognize land titles to Indians,
40%
Flag icon
The chief, in other words, claimed all of Texas except for a 125-mile belt along the Gulf Coast, insisting that his people needed the land for their bison and wild horses.
40%
Flag icon
1847, then, Comanchería’s southern border stood almost exactly where it had been ten years before. By enforcing a formal boundary line, Comanches had drawn a major concession from the far richer and far more populous Texas: although official maps failed to show it, Texans had signed away nearly half of their claimed territory to the Comanche nation.
40%
Flag icon
Comanches, too, had compromised. When they imposed a fixed border, they in effect gave up their arrogated privilege to raid Texas for livestock and slaves and extort it for tribute, privileges that had sustained their economic growth for nearly a century.
40%
Flag icon
so thoroughly and suppressed local resistance so completely that, in economic and military terms, much of northern Mexico became an extension of Greater Comanchería.
40%
Flag icon
out which nation they procure slaves.”
40%
Flag icon
Lipan and Mescalero hunting and war parties from entering the contested raiding and trading grounds around San Antonio. Comanches also seized Apache captives, who fetched high prices in San Antonio, Santa Fe, and Nacogdoches, and whose enslavement underwrote the Comanche-Spanish alliance.
40%
Flag icon
From there on, the raids escalated steadily, eventually engulfing much of northern Mexico. In 1828 Comanches razed the recently built military town of Palafox on the lower Río Grande, killing most of its inhabitants.
40%
Flag icon
services, Comanches imported enough horticultural produce to sustain a population of twenty to thirty thousand
41%
Flag icon
They transformed themselves
41%
Flag icon
into large-scale slaveholders, and they did so by combing northern Mexico for captives
41%
Flag icon
Mexico’s northern provinces lost more than two thousand men, women, and children to Indian captivity between 1816 and 1821.
42%
Flag icon
The scalp wars devastated the Apaches who, unlike the Comanches, could not evade mercenary scalping squads by escaping far to the north. James Kirker, the most notorious of the soldiers of fortune, focused his business-style operations almost solely on Apaches, delivering almost five hundred Apache scalps to Chihuahuan authorities by 1847, but he largely avoided the more mobile and better-armed Comanches. In fact, as scalp payments became an established practice in Chihuahua in the late 1830s, Comanches, too, began to hunt Apaches for the standard bounty prize, a crown with an ear on each end.
42%
Flag icon
Ruxton lacked answers, it was because he could not see the big picture: Comanches had turned a large section of Mexico into a semicolonized landscape of extraction from which they could mine resources with little cost.
42%
Flag icon
Mexico lost more than half of its territory to the United States. Historians have customarily attributed Mexico’s capitulation to the overt material and military superiority of the United States, but they have missed a crucial element: the Native American expansion that paved the way for the Anglo-American one. The U.S. takeover of the Southwest was significantly assisted by the fact that Comanches and Apaches had already destabilized Mexico’s Far North.
43%
Flag icon
The linkages between Comanche power politics and U.S. expansion culminated in the Mexican-American War, a war so one-sided that Ulysses S. Grant called it “one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation.”
43%
Flag icon
When U.S. troops marched south of that river in 1846, they did so alongside Comanche warriors who had raided there for decades, sabotaging Mexico’s nation-building project in the far north and unintentionally preparing the ground for the American invasion.
1 8 12