it was—if there was any point at all—to passionately discuss the suffering of women in America. The word oppression here was defined to mean things like making ninety cents on the dollar compared with men, or being only the vice president of a Fortune 500 company rather than the CEO, or how male-dominated office culture doesn’t make it safe for women to cry.
Resorting to hyperbole and distortions only undermines an argument rather than strengthening it. It's not and never has been 90 cents on the dollar...the dearth of female ceos is a real thing even if you aren't concerned about it-? and I doubt any vice presidents were present for this discussion...being able to CRY at WORK has never been on the list of concerns and that's not even current- the 80s called and they want their stupid sexist stand up comic joke back.
