More on this book
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between
July 22 - August 12, 2022
operationalize
This action was about subtlety, something for which Trump was not known.
Leaks were a chronic problem in the administration. Much of the information being disclosed to the media at the time seemed to be coming from the White House and was focused on internal policy disputes—Afghanistan, Syria, Turkey, and Venezuela, for example.
The individual motivations for the leaks ranged from advancing a preferred policy outcome to enhancing the leaker’s own role or credentials to currying favor with the president. It was a noxious behavior learned from the top. The president was the biggest leaker of all.
Across the room from where he sat to eat lunch, a large TV hung on the wall about fifteen feet away. It was constantly on, playing Fox News, which meant that conversations were often interrupted when Trump saw news stories that interested him. In midsentence the president would stop talking, raise his left hand in a gesture to suspend the conversation, reach down to the table for the remote control with his right hand, and immediately raise the volume—listening for a few seconds, and then commenting on what he just heard. It was very predictable.
With Congress already having spent $3 trillion on COVID, and the pandemic raging across the country, I concurred, adding there was “no amount of money that we could credibly spend on vaccine development that wouldn’t have a high return on investment.”
In Barr’s view, Maduro had “weaponized” cocaine to undermine the United States. Illicit drugs were “killing millions of Americans” and harming communities across the country. It was hard to find a family who didn’t have a friend or relative somehow affected by this scourge. “Stopping the flow of drugs, and specifically out of Venezuela, is what we should focus on,” Barr argued.
The notable omissions here are ignoring the demand side and big pharma's pushing of opioids and fentanyl.
Our goal was to increase interdiction efforts through a 65 percent increase in Navy ships, Coast Guard vessels, and airborne reconnaissance, with more than one thousand additional military personnel to bolster the counternarcotics mission.
In all this, I see no consideration of whether these interdiction efforts are cost effective, or indeed have any effect at all in reducing the harm caused by drugs.

