The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Gates’s vaccine obsession has diverted WHO’s giving away from poverty alleviation, nutrition, and clean water to make vaccine uptake its preeminent public health metric.

the sheer magnitude of his foundation’s financial contributions has made Bill Gates an unofficial—albeit unelected—leader of the WHO. By 2017, Gates’s power was so complete that he handpicked his deputy, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, as the WHO’s new director general despite complaints that Tedros would be the first director general to the WHO without a medical degree and despite Tedros’s dubious background.

As Ethiopia’s foreign minister, Tedros aggressively suppressed freedom of speech, including arresting and jailing journalists who criticized his party’s policies. Tedros’s key qualification for the WHO gig was his loyalty to Gates. Tedros previously served on the boards of two organizations that Gates founded, funded, and controls: GAVI and the Global Fund, where Tedros was Gates’s trusted chair of the board.137,138

“The Gates Foundation has already effectively privatized the international body charged with creating health policy, transforming it into a vehicle for corporate dominance.

In April 2021, his unyielding allegiance to patent rights—and corporate profits—finally caused cracks to appear in the monolithic support for Gates among mainstream media and the public health establishment.

When push turns to shove, patent protection eclipses his professed concerns for public health.

dispositive.

solipsistic

Today, leading public health officials agree that the primary drivers of the current artificial shortage of COVID-19 vaccines is Gates’s defense of intellectual property rights to protect the profiteering by his pharma partners.

Federal law requires that every injury or death following vaccination during clinical trials—or, by logical extension, with emergency use products—must be attributed to the vaccine unless proven otherwise.

The Internet assassination speculations reached a boil following the strange murder of President Jovenel Moïse of Haiti by a team of elite, well-trained Colombian mercenaries with links to United States intelligence agencies.

I document the keen interest by the Western intelligence community and militaries in the African vaccine enterprise in Chapter 12, “Germ Games.” The historic involvement of Western intelligence agencies in coups and the murders of African leaders on behalf of their corporate clientele is well documented.

Lumumba—a beloved nationalist who led the Congo’s liberation movement against Belgium—

We have since learned that the CIA and the Belgian intelligence agencies collaborated in Lumumba’s murder. (In 2002, Belgium formally apologized for its role in the assassination.)

Congressional investigations in the 1970s exposed the CIA’s years of experimentation to develop untraceable poisons and secretive murder tools. CIA scientists, including NIH brain surgeon Maitland Baldwin, working under MKUltra’s director Sidney Gottlieb at Ft. Detrick, concocted a diabolical arsenal of assassination weaponry including beamed radio frequency radiation, pathogenic microbes, and dissipating chemicals, all intended to mimic natural deaths. This armory of toxins gave the agency capacity to assassinate uncooperative foreign leaders while avoiding suspicion.

two Los Angeles Times investigative reporters, Charles Piller and Doug Smith, employed the term “White Man’s Burden” to describe the catastrophic impact of Gates’s medical meddling in Africa.167 That title suggests that Gates’s efforts to rescue the dark races from disease and famine mask all the familiar impulses for imperial control.

The Times investigation found that Gates’s programs, including those of the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance, have had net negative consequences on public health. In fact, the Times found an inverse correlation between dollars spent by Gates’s charities and declines in children’s health. The nations that get the most Gates money see the worst health outcomes.169

Bill Gates’s continent-wide experiment on the African population is a long tragic joke. The Times reporters deliver its devastating punchline: “2006 data, the most recent available, show a paradoxical relationship between GAVI funding in Africa and child mortality. Overall, child mortality improved more often in nations that received smaller than average GAVI grants per capita. In seven nations that received greater-than-average funding, child mortality rates worsened.”199

obsequious

After the devastating Los Angeles Times piece, Gates moved aggressively to neutralize the once-independent press with compromising grants that struggling news organizations couldn’t refuse.

at least $250 million in grants to media outlets including NPR, Public Television (PBS), The Guardian, The Independent, BBC, Al Jazeera, Propublica, The Daily Telegraph, The Atlantic, The Texas Tribune, Gannett, Washington Monthly, Le Monde, The Financial Times, The National Journal, Univision, Medium, and the New York Times

The foundation has also invested millions in journalism training and in researching effective ways of crafting media narratives to support Gates’s global ambitions.

moolah

Jeff Bezos’s Washington Post called Gates the “champion of science-backed solutions.”

The New York Times gushes that he is “the most interesting man in the world.”213 Time Magazine dubbed him “Master of the Universe.”214 Forbes calls Gates “savior of the world” who “set the standard for a billionaire good citizen.”215 Looking on admiringly, editors of fashion magazine V...

Ignoring the fact that Gates never graduated from college, much less medical school, mainstream media outlets unanimously parrot BBC’s assessment that Gates is a “public...

None of those reporters mentioned the fact that the quarantines that Gates was cheerleading on their networks have increased Gates’s wealth by $22 billion over twelve months.

HHS admitted that we were, in fact, correct: none of the mandated childhood vaccines had been tested for safety in pre-licensing inert placebo tests.3 The best of Bill Gates’s African vaccines are all on this list.

But Bill Gates also uses a large retinue of much more dangerous and demonstrably ineffective vaccines in Africa—ones that Western countries have actually rejected because of dire safety signals.

Furthermore, it means that all of Gates’s African vaccines are experimental products. For Gates and his cronies, the continent is a mass human experiment—with no control groups and no functional data collection systems—for shoddily tested, high-risk medical interventions.

His unwillingness to actually measure or prove the effectiveness of his prescriptions in reducing mortality and improving health suggests that Gates appreciates that his vaccines are not the human health miracle he proclaims.

In the colonial era, Africa provided model precincts for testing new vaccines. In the 1950s, white colonial overlords rolled out the red carpet for pharmaceutical companies to perform vaccine experiments on compliant test subjects numbering in the millions.

Every trial delay eats into the critical time period when the product enjoys patent protection.

In the 1980s, Pharma therefore moved most of its clinical trials to poor nations where human guinea pigs are cheap and even the most severe injuries will rarely delay the study.

Government complicity and anemic corporate liability laws allow vaccine makers to write off injuries as collateral damage with l...

Gates’s pervasive control over WHO has made Africa his fiefdom.9

A wave of gruesome brain injuries and deaths followed the introduction of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccines in the United States and Europe in the 1970s.

pertussis.

Six years later, a 1983 NIH-funded UCLA study found that Wyeth’s DTP vaccine was killing or causing severe brain injury, including seizures and death, in 1 in every 300 vaccinated children.11 The resultant lawsuits caused the collapse of insurance markets for vaccines and threatened to bankrupt the industry. Wyeth—now Pfizer—claimed to be losing $20 in downstream liability for every dollar it earned on vaccine sales, and induced Congress to pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 shielding vaccine makers from liability.12

In 1991, the United States, E.U. countries, and Japan switched to a far safer (but less effective) dead cell (attenuated) vaccine—DTaP—and discontinued use of the DTP jab.14 While Western nations pulled the DTP, WHO gave pharma free rein and cash to dump its toxic inventories in Africa, Asia, and Central America, despite strong evidence of its deadly impacts.15

That 2017 study (Mogensen et al., 2017)20 shows that, following their DTP immunization at three months, vaccinated girls had tenfold higher mortality than unvaccinated children.

for two decades no one noticed that the dying children were predominantly those who received the vaccine.

The DTP vaccine—while protecting children against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis—had ruined their immune systems, making them vulnerable to a wide range of deadly nontarget infections.

In other words, Gates’s DTP vaccine—instead of saving 10 million lives, as he claims22—may have unnecessarily killed millions of African girls.

The idealistic Americans who donated to Gates’s African vaccine project—believing they were saving African babies—were actually funding a continent-wide female genocide.24

plenipotentiary

gasconaded

The immunity provisions of the 1986 Vaccine Act gave a blank check to US pharmaceutical companies to promote the most shoddily tested vaccines without consequences or cost. Pharma responded with a gold rush to add new lucrative vaccines to the schedule, and by 1991, mercury exposures to US children from the vaccine preservative thimerosal had more than doubled.29

Alarmed at the exploding epidemics of neurodevelopmental, allergic, and autoimmune diseases in children that began in 1986, CDC commenced in 1999 an in-house study of the vast repository of health and vaccination data from the ten largest HMOs stored in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). A specially assembled CDC research team led by Belgian epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten compared health outcomes in hundreds of thousands of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The raw data from CDC’s 1999 Verstraeten study showed that children who took thimerosal-containing hepatitis B vaccines in their first thirty days suffered an astonishing 1,135 percent higher rate of autism than children who did not.30

Verstraeten reported that these shocking signals prompted him to review, for the first time, the published medical literature, where he confirmed the alarming toxicity of mercury (thimerosal) to cause these injuries was biologically plausible.