The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health
Rate it:
Open Preview
30%
Flag icon
It’s no surprise that a 2004 Office of Government Ethics investigation chided Dr. Fauci for failing to control the corrupting entanglements between his staffers and pharmaceutical companies.11,12
31%
Flag icon
Dr. Fauci has done almost nothing to advance NIAID’s core obligation of researching the causes of the devastating explosions in epidemics of chronic allergic and autoimmune diseases that, under his tenure, have mushroomed to afflict 54 percent of children,35 up from 12.8 percent when he took charge of NIAID in 1984.36
32%
Flag icon
Peanut allergies, asthma, and autoimmune diseases (e.g., diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis) were still so rare that their occasional occurrences in schoolchildren were novelties.
32%
Flag icon
By the twentieth century, more people were dying of old age and heart attacks than from contagious illnesses.15
32%
Flag icon
“They were hoping for a new plague. Polio was over. There were memos going around the agency saying, ‘We need to find the new plague’; ‘We need to find something to scare the American people so they will give us more money.’”26
32%
Flag icon
Prior to 1997, the FDA forbade pharmaceutical advertising on television, and the drug companies had not yet transformed television reporters into pharmaceutical reps.
32%
Flag icon
Sixty Minutes aired a scathing segment in which Mike Wallace mercilessly exposed the corruption, incompetence, and cover-ups at HHS that led to the phony swine flu pandemic and the wave of casualties from NIH’s experimental vaccine.37
32%
Flag icon
In a poignant emblem of the ascending power of the pharmaceutical paradigm under Dr. Fauci’s stewardship, the Sixty Minutes report on the 1976 pandemic scandal is now largely scrubbed from the Internet. You can still view it on the Children’s Health Defense website.
35%
Flag icon
Mike Wallace, “Swine Flu”, 60 Minutes, YouTube Video (Nov 4, 1979) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bOHYZhL0WQ
37%
Flag icon
“We could have saved millions of lives with repurposed and therapeutic drugs. But there’s no profit in it. It’s all got to be about newly patented antivirals and their mischievous vaccines.”14
37%
Flag icon
He made himself a villain among AIDS activists with a fear-mongering 1983 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association warning that AIDS could spread by casual contact.20
37%
Flag icon
“If the spread of AIDS continues at this rate, in 1996 there could be one billion people infected; five years later, hypothetically ten billion.” Crenshaw asked, “Could we be facing the threat of extinction during our lifetime?”23
37%
Flag icon
Melisa Wallack and Craig Borten, who received Oscar nominations for their script, Dallas Buyers Club,
38%
Flag icon
On March 24, 2020, he answered a question from a journalist by admitting that, if he became ill with COVID, he would take hydroxychloroquine as his remedy.59 Shortly thereafter, Dr. Fauci launched his aggressive campaign to deny HCQ—and all early treatments—to the rest of humanity.
39%
Flag icon
AIDS activists afterward learned that at the same time Dr. Fauci was telling them and Senator Kennedy’s office that he was finally testing AL 721, Teflon Tony was confiding to his Pharma PIs that he had rigged the AL 721 studies to fail: “I wanted to debunk it,” he reassured them.
39%
Flag icon
The Swiss newspaper Weltwoche termed his AZT trials a “gigantic botch-up.”90,91
39%
Flag icon
Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story (Poison) (1990) and The AIDS War: Propaganda, Profiteering and Genocide from the Medical-Industrial Complex (TAW) (1993).93
40%
Flag icon
“AZT: Cause for Concern.”
40%
Flag icon
Nevertheless, based upon Dr. Fauci’s word alone, Twitter immediately evicted Minaj from its platform, censoring her communication with her 22 million followers.
43%
Flag icon
The term “settled science” is an oxymoron.
43%
Flag icon
Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.1
43%
Flag icon
Science Fictions: A Scientific Mystery, a Massive Cover-up and the Dark Legacy of Robert Gallo,
44%
Flag icon
The AIDS Pandemic: The Collision of Epidemiology and Political Correctness,
45%
Flag icon
In fact, AIDS commonly occurs in people who test HIV negative. If HIV is truly the only cause of AIDS, this should not be possible.
45%
Flag icon
non-HIV AIDS
46%
Flag icon
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
46%
Flag icon
Dr. Fauci’s lead, doctors dubbed CFS as “Yuppie Flu,” characterizing it as a neurotic affliction among women genetically unequipped for high-pressure corporate jobs that suddenly opened to them in the 1980s,
46%
Flag icon
In Djamel Tahi’s 1996 documentary AIDS—The Doubt,
47%
Flag icon
Rebecca Culshaw’s Science Sold Out.
47%
Flag icon
Duesberg’s Inventing the AIDS Virus,
47%
Flag icon
The AIDS War, Osler’s Web by Hillary Johnson, and Harvey Bialy’s Oncogenes, Aneuploidy, and AIDS.
47%
Flag icon
“The Deconstruction of the AIDS” article by Yale mathematician Serge Lang, and an insightful chapter titled “Fear and Lawyers in Los Angeles” in Kary...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
47%
Flag icon
Instead of civilly debating these dissidents and writers and common-sense questions posed by Duesberg and other critics, Dr. Fauci’s strategy has been to exercise his frightening capacity to silence dissent and mangle reputations. History may ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
49%
Flag icon
(“Rethinking-AIDS” website lists more than two thousand distinguished members: www.rethinkingaids.com.)8, 9
50%
Flag icon
Duesberg.
51%
Flag icon
Peter Duesberg.43
51%
Flag icon
Barbara McClintock
51%
Flag icon
Walter Gilbert,
51%
Flag icon
Duesberg’s most surprising convert was Luc Montagnier, the man who first discovered the virus.
51%
Flag icon
Science costs money and he who dispenses the money can control the science.”
51%
Flag icon
The Other Side of AIDS
51%
Flag icon
Duesberg and many who have followed him offered evidence that heavy recreational drug use in gay men and drug addicts was the real cause of immune deficiency among the first generation of AIDS sufferers.
51%
Flag icon
(Those interested in exploring the debate should read Chapter 3, Virus Hunting Takes Over, of Duesberg’s riveting book Inventing the AIDS Virus.)
51%
Flag icon
On average, the early AIDS patients had been on at least three antibiotics courses in the year preceding diagnosis.64
52%
Flag icon
Researchers believe poppers to be the direct cause of Kaposi’s sarcoma, a rare form of skin cancer that afflicts the nose, throat, lungs, and skin.77
52%
Flag icon
Kaposi’s sarcoma was the initial indicator disease of AIDS, but it was also common in gay men who were not infected with HIV.
52%
Flag icon
Prior to Gallo’s announcement, CDC had targeted poppers as the likely culprit for AIDS.
52%
Flag icon
A year before Gallo’s announcement, CDC’s in-house AIDS expert Harry Haverkos analyzed three surveys of AIDS patients conducted by the CDC. He concluded that drugs like poppers played a key role in the disease onset.
52%
Flag icon
Following Gallo’s 1984 press conference, Dr. Fauci launched a mission to quash all conversation about cofactors like poppers. The CDC quickly fell in line.
52%
Flag icon
The CDC actively suppressed disagreeable data and published one of its signature junk science papers to “prove” poppers safe.82