More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between
November 28, 2021 - February 18, 2022
If Duesberg is right, AIDS is an iatrogenic (doctor-caused) pandemic, and Dr. Fauci would be its author.
“AIDS is a chronic long-term breakdown of the immune system that can be caused by multiple factors,” says Mark Gabrish Conlan, gay historian, publisher, “generally more than one of them operating within any particular person with AIDS or with what has been described as AIDS. And at the top of that, in the west would be recreational drug use, also pharmaceutical drug use and repeated infections, including with diseases that are genuinely sexually transmitted, repeated antibiotic treatments for these: a lifestyle that involves a lot of partying, lack of nutrition, and in the less-developed
...more
If Arthur Ashe’s suspicions and Duesberg’s suppositions are correct, Dr. Fauci would be the father of the AIDS pandemic and responsible for prolific deaths. So that story must never be found to be true.
Concurring with Sonnaband’s assessment, John Lauritsen accuses Dr. Fauci of conducting genocides against gay men and Black Africans. The evidence seems to indicate that the proliferation of AZT increased death rates from “AIDS” dramatically.108
According to the CDC, in the fifth full year of AIDS, 1986, 12,205 people “with” AIDS died in the United States. At that time, CDC—in a now-familiar scheme to stoke pandemic fears—used deceptive protocols to inflate the body counts. The CDC’s mortality numbers include anyone with an HIV positive antibody “status,” even if the deceased had no “AIDS defining illness,” and instead succumbed to suicide, a drug overdose, a car accident, or a heart attack.
“Harm is usually underreported,” he wrote. “To prove it you need three studies: The AZT licensing Fischl study,120 the Hemophiliac study in Nature where [editor] John Maddox showed that the HIV positive hemophiliacs started dying only the very year AZT was introduced.121 And lastly, the Concorde Lancet study122 which showed: the more AZT, the more Death.”
NIAID funneled extravagant annual public education grants to advocacy groups. The funding effectively muted their criticisms of Dr. Fauci.
Other political, economic, and ideological rationales helped Dr. Fauci recruit gay community leaders to his campaign to build a cancel culture against Duesberg and drown out his voice in the liberal mainstream press.
His historical cultivation of relationships with gay leaders was one of the factors that made Dr. Fauci a darling of liberals during the early COVID crisis.
“Well, I don’t know if you’ve been tracking the kinds of exposés that Science magazine and others have published, that 80 percent of AIDS research monies are retained within the federal government programs on AIDS research. I think the science is very inbred. And I think there’s been a real resistance to entertaining hypotheses or directions of AIDS research that aren’t looking specifically at HIV, and that is the basic problem.
Such revelations could only have terrified Tony Fauci. Ever since the 1992 Amsterdam meeting, Dr. Fauci had been insisting that CFS was a psychosomatic disease. The suggestion that it might be related to AIDS threatened the entire HIV paradigm.
At the June 1990 San Francisco AIDS conference, Luc Montagnier made his tectonic announcement that “The HIV virus is harmless and passive, a benign virus.”160, 161 He added that he had discovered that HIV only becomes dangerous in the presence of a second organism.
In a film interview with Brent Leung in 2006, Tony Fauci said, “Cofactors are not necessary. The data that indicate that any different type of infection like mycoplasma or something like that is a necessary cofactor, I believe those theories have been debunked.”171 As usual, Dr. Fauci never cited the study that debunked the work of America’s top military AIDS researcher, or the Nobel laureate who discovered HIV.
As Kary Mullis says in his book Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, “What people call science today is probably very similar to what was called science in 1634. Galileo was told to recant his beliefs or be excommunicated. People who refuse to accept the commandments of the AIDS establishment are basically told the same thing.”
As late as 1989, the CDC conducted lethal experiments with a hazardous measles vaccine on Black children in Cameroon, Haiti, and South-Central Los Angeles, killing dozens of little girls before halting the program.4 CDC did not tell “volunteers” that they were participating in an experiment. In 2014, another CDC whistleblower, the agency’s senior vaccine safety scientist, Dr. William Thompson, disclosed that top CDC officials had forced him and four other senior researchers to lie to the public and destroy data that showed disproportionate vaccine injuries—including a 340 percent elevated risk
...more
The 1980 Bayh–Dole Act8 allowed NIAID—and Dr. Fauci personally—to file patents on the hundreds of new drugs that his agency-funded PIs were incubating, and then to license those drugs to pharmaceutical companies and collect royalties on their sales.
Fauci has a conflict of interest and this needs to be removed as an allowable function of a person in this role.
Pharma’s ethics quickly pervaded and corrupted NIAID’s culture. The agency routinely overlooked and often sanctioned and engaged in routine manipulation of science to “prove” efficacy of dangerous and ineffective drugs. Callous disregard toward suffering and deaths among clinical trial volunteers became a feature of NIAID’s modus operandi.
“Stephen Nicholas was not only director of the ICC until 2002; he also simultaneously sat on the Pediatric Medical Advisory Panel, which was supposed to oversee the tests—which signifies a serious conflict of interest,”
Scheff continued, “The drugs being given to the children are toxic—they’re known to cause genetic mutation, organ failure, bone marrow death, bodily deformations, brain damage, and fatal skin disorders.
They were throw-away children.” Sharav said that at least eighty children died in Dr. Fauci’s Manhattan concentration camp and accused NIAID and its partners of disposing of children’s remains in mass graves.
The decision to allow experiments with highly toxic drugs at an orphanage devoid of medical personnel was, itself, a stunning act of malpractice.
John Solomon’s AP investigation finally brought Dr. Fauci’s experiments to national prominence. AP identified at least forty-eight AIDS experiments NIAID conducted on foster children in seven states—mostly in violation of the federal requirement that NIAID provide those children an advocate. In addition to the Dapsone trial that killed at least ten children, NIAID sponsored another study testing a combination of adult antiretroviral drugs. AP reported that of the fifty-two children in the trial, there were twenty-six moderate to severe reactions—nearly all in infants. The side effects included
...more
carried Black Box warnings of potentially lethal side effects: Aldesleukin, Dapsone, Didanosine, Lamivudine, Nevirapine, Ritonavir, Stavudine, and Zidovudine.40, 41
You’d see a certain child refusing over and over, and one day they’d come back from the hospital from surgery, and they had a tube coming right out of their stomach. If you asked why, the doctors said it was for “compliance”—the regimen. Got to keep up the regimen,’ said Mimi. ‘Those were the rules.’”
The Vera Institute, relying mostly on city ACS documents, confirmed eighty deaths and that many other children suffered serious harm: “The child welfare files contained information indicating that some children experienced serious toxicities, or side effects, from trial medications, such as reduced liver function or severe anemia. These toxicities were consistent with toxicities described in published articles about the trials.”
eighty of the 532 children who participated in clinical trials or observational studies died while in foster care; • twenty-five of the children died while enrolled in a medication trial; • sixty-four children participated in thirty medication trials that were NOT REVIEWED by a special medical advisory panel, as the city’s policy required; • and twenty-one children participated in trials that the panel had reviewed but had NOT RECOMMENDED. • (In both cases, thirteen of the enrollments occurred before the children were placed in foster care.)
During the decades since Dr. Fauci took over NIAID, he has sanctioned drug companies to experiment on at least fourteen thousand children, many of them Black and Hispanic orphans living in foster homes.
Freedom of Information documents obtained in January 2021 by the White Coat Waste project show that Dr. Fauci approved a $424,000 NIAID grant in 2020 for experiments in which dogs were bitten to death by flies.
Just as President Eisenhower warned. Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 response has steadily deconstructed our democracy and elevated the powers of a tyrannical medical technocracy.
“The fearful fascination with the contagion was amplified by the official narrative that the disease originated in Africans doing weird things with monkeys, and spread to the voodoo kingdom of Haiti, and that the sexual depravity of homosexuals drove the disease into the United States.”
According to Vera Sharav, Dr. Fauci had NIAID and its pharmaceutical company partners move his most controversial and risky studies offshore “because they can do stuff that they could never get away with in the United States.”
In 2005, FDA officials learned that Dr. Fauci’s DAIDS team had concealed scores of deaths and hundreds of injuries during HIV drug trials in Africa with another of his toxic chemotherapy vanity products, Nevirapine.3, 4, 5
Dr. Fauci told the President that Nevirapine would save millions of lives by preventing maternal transmission of HIV to unborn children.
In its efforts to win FDA approvals for the dangerous and ineffective concoction, DAIDS’s team had violated virtually every good clinical practice, including the unlawful failure to employ the standardized informed consent procedure of disclosing serious risks to study participants.
NIAID’s Uganda team told the Westat researchers that they had lost the critical log that, among other things, recorded all the adverse events and deaths.
When Westat confronted Dr. Jackson’s researchers with study discrepancies, they admitted that they routinely applied more lenient standards for their Black Ugandan subjects than FDA rules required for US safety studies.18 The PIs admitted to systematically downgrading standardized definitions of serious adverse events to adapt to “local standards.” Injuries that researchers would score as “serious” or “deadly” if they happened to white Americans became “minor” injuries when Black Africans were the victims. Under their relaxed rubric, clinical trials staff scored “life-threatening” injuries as
...more
During her document inspection, Dr. Smith took notice of the poor quality and the incompleteness of the safety data. Shoddy recordkeeping at the site revealed that the study did not comply with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. GCP is a requirement for all NIH-funded clinical research and any studies conducted for the purpose of supporting the safety and effectiveness of investigational drugs.
Dr. Smith’s draft safety report raised all kinds of noisome alarms: she noted that medical records such as clinical notes, which are source documents needed to validate study data, were missing, incomplete, and often unsigned or undated.29 This made it difficult to validate the occurrence of adverse events.
She found that the Uganda team had neglected to report numerous infant deaths and routinely failed to track patients who had abnormal lab values, clinical signs, and symptoms to determine how these problems resolved.
This was the delicate lingua franca that bureaucrats employ to accuse one another of fraud.
“Dr. Fauci said he was going to save African pregnant women and their babies. It turns out that this is an extremely dangerous drug with no demonstrated ability to save a single life. This isn’t rocket science. Dr. Fauci knew all about the ‘safety problems,’ but for Fauci and his cult of HIV drug worship, no drug is ever ‘unsafe.’”
In Dr. Fishbein’s words, Tramont simply “rewrote the safety section, minimizing concerns about the toxicities, deaths, and record-keeping problems that had been highlighted by his medical safety expert.” Tramont’s editing skills produced a document that laid the foundation, in December 2002, for FDA’s approval of the lethal concoction for global use on pregnant women.
Either Bush was a complete moron or is actually part of the swamp. My bet is that both statements are true.
Presenting awards to one another is a knee-jerk strategy by which vaccine experts paper over malefactions and atrocities. It is therefore not surprising that, to advance the cover-up and absolve the Uganda research team, Tramont recommended that Dr. Fauci get his putative NIH boss, Elias Zerhouni, to present Dr. Jackson and his Uganda project researchers who had supervised the African debacle with an NIH award.
“The tragic irony here is that the Kampala Nevirapine research was performed to a level of standards that would be insufficient for supporting the drug’s approval for use in the United States, but Fauci fervently defended the study as adequate to justify giving nevirapine to Black Africans. Frankly, it strikes me as racist.” Reverend Jesse Jackson echoed Fishbein’s sentiment: “This was not a thoughtful and reasonable decision, but a crime against humanity. Research standards and drug quality that are unacceptable in the US and other Western countries must never be pushed onto Africa.”36
The pharmaceutical and the medical cartel’s historical preference was to test dangerous drugs and medical procedures on people of color. But by the late 1990s, Black Americans were increasingly suspicious of medical authorities.
It’s an embarrassment to me, to my family, and particularly to my deceased aunt and godmother that NIH’s Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development was a collaborator in this fraud.
When the shattered family gathered around her body, Dr. Thorpe and his team told them, to their bewilderment, that Joyce had died of rapidly progressed AIDS. They were lying. The year after her passing, Associated Press reporter John Solomon gave Joyce’s family a trove of DAIDS reports he had obtained from a Freedom of Information Act request.43 In those internal memos, DAIDS officials openly acknowledged to one another that Nevirapine caused Joyce Hafford’s liver to fail.
Hafford was not the only trial recruit to suffer. In the initial Phase I trial on twenty-one pregnant women, NIAID’s investigators would later report that four of twenty-two infants died and twelve suffered “serious adverse events.” Furthermore, the studies suggested that Nevirapine was ineffective. None of the women experienced reduction of viral loads.
It was now evident to key NIAID officials that Dr. Fishbein was becoming an all-around nuisance. He was professional, curious, incorruptible, and far too serious about performing his duties. “His big problem,” says Farber, “is that he thought his job was legit. Dr. Fishbein’s personal virtues were all fatal character flaws within the NIAID institutional culture.” Dr. Fishbein’s refusal to toe the line sent him stumbling into the terminal career cul-de-sac at NIAID.
