Russell's agnosticism and ambiguity about his own views on ethical values were at least more honest than Harris's morality concocted in his own mind—as if morality should be self-evident to everybody, regardless of whether God exists or not. Harris's antagonism toward God ends up proving that he intuitively finds some things reprehensible. But he cannot explain his innate sense of right and wrong—the reality of God's law written on his heart—because there is no logical explanation for how that intuition toward morality could develop from sheer matter and chemistry.
