When Minsky and Papert reached this conclusion, it effectively killed most of the funding for the connectionism field, and it would be decades before it came back. But in fact, back in 1964 Rosenblatt explained to me that the Perceptron’s inability to deal with invariance was due to a lack of layers. If you took the output of a Perceptron and fed it back to another layer just like it, the output would be more general and, with repeated iterations of this process, would increasingly be able to deal with invariance. If you had enough layers and enough training data, it could deal with an amazing
...more

