A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century
Rate it:
Open Preview
52%
Flag icon
considerable scope. And apart from its profits, the Constableship had become, with the widening of war, a post of
58%
Flag icon
The wave of insurrection passed, leaving little change in the condition of the working class. Inertia in the scales of history weighs more heavily than change. Four hundred years were to elapse before the descendants of the Maillotins seized the Bastille.
58%
Flag icon
THE LURE OF A FOOTHOLD in Italy exerted the same pull on the French as a foothold in France exerted on the English. From the time the Duc d’Anjou crossed the Alps in 1382, the Angevin claim to the Kingdom of Naples drew France southward, creating a habit of intervention that was to persist on and off for 500 years.
Dave liked this
60%
Flag icon
The social damage was not in the failure but in the undertaking, which was expensive. The cost of war was the poison running through the 14th century. The funds contributed by the crown and by Anjou himself, not to mention the sum stolen by Pierre de Craon, were squeezed from the people of France for a cause which could in no way, present or future, benefit them. This did not escape notice, nor soothe the popular mood.
Aloke and 1 other person liked this
82%
Flag icon
Why do men fight? Wars may be fought for the glorification of man’s feelings about himself, or for a specific goal in power, territory, or political balance. Medieval war was not always impractical. Charles V cared nothing for glorification if he could only get the English out of France.
Dave and 1 other person liked this
John
· Flag
John
Well Larry, I see you find this book interesting. Ms Tuchman is always an interesting read. I forget details in the book. Thanks for posting. I remember that I liked it. I can't remember s__t any more…