Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between May 19, 2021 - August 18, 2023
23%
Flag icon
the accuracy of predictions made by professionals, by machines, and by simple rules. You will not be surprised by our conclusion that the professionals come third in this competition.
23%
Flag icon
noise is a major factor in the inferiority of human judgment.
23%
Flag icon
percent concordant (PC), which answers a more specific question: Suppose you take a pair of employees at random. What is the probability that the one who scored higher on an evaluation of potential also performs better on the job?
24%
Flag icon
most judgments are made in a state of what we call objective ignorance, because many things on which the future depends can simply not be known.
24%
Flag icon
clinical judgment. You consider the information, perhaps engage in a quick computation, consult your intuition, and come up with a judgment.
25%
Flag icon
Meehl’s results strongly suggest that any satisfaction you felt with the quality of your judgment was an illusion: the illusion of validity.
25%
Flag icon
If you find yourself confused by the distinction between cases and predictions, you are in excellent company: Everybody finds that distinction confusing.
25%
Flag icon
If you are as confident in your predictions as you are in your evaluation of cases, however, you are a victim of the illusion of validity.
25%
Flag icon
The findings support a blunt conclusion: simple models beat humans.
25%
Flag icon
people are inferior to statistical models in many ways. One of their critical weaknesses is that they are noisy.
1 3 Next »