Reviews generally occur after mistakes, and not as a routine. And when they do occur, they seem to be directed at what happened, whereas the cognitive critiques are aimed at the thought processes of the key decision makers. Moreover, reviews are conducted in a forum that is usually not conducive to reflection.
Story based; in a safe environment; focused on understanding each perspective and not criticising or offering counter factuals; running regularly as chaos exercises with an integral review process instead of waiting for things to happen. All important aspects packed into this bit.
