This is patently erroneous on nearly every level. We cannot “make the market work for us” any more than we can “make free speech work for us.” Both already work for us, because neither invades our rights; the greatest guarantee that free speech, like free markets, is an asset is to live virtuously and urge others to do so as well. Carlson’s key error—the belief that there is a collective “we” damaged by the free market—is obvious. We can redistribute the benefits of the market for some, destroying those benefits for others. Every interference in the market represents a trade-off. That
...more

