Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time: The Historical Jesus and the Heart of Contemporary Faith
Rate it:
Open Preview
28%
Flag icon
Elijah, a social prophet who was experientially in touch with the Spirit of God. He even, according to the stories about him, “journeyed in the Spirit,”
28%
Flag icon
prophets of ancient Israel. For most of them the story of th...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
28%
Flag icon
Ezekiel, whose book begins with words that almost make the hairs on the back of one’s neck stand up: “In the thirtieth year, in the fourth month of the year, on the fifth day of the month, by the river Chebar, the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God.”
28%
Flag icon
Saul became the apostle Paul through his experience of the Spirit.
28%
Flag icon
According to Paul himself, he had a vivid experience of journeying into “the third heaven”
28%
Flag icon
It seems to me that, given that there really are spirit persons and that the Jewish tradition included many such figures, Jesus was clearly a spirit person.
28%
Flag icon
That vision was followed by a series of visions in the wilderness in what we typically call the temptation narrative, but which a cultural anthropologist would recognize immediately as a wilderness ordeal or vision quest, characteristic of spirit persons.36
28%
Flag icon
About them it is said in the Jewish tradition that they would still their hearts before God before they would heal.
28%
Flag icon
Why would a first-century Jewish person address God as “Papa” when his tradition typically used much more formal terms of address for God?
28%
Flag icon
It is a bit shocking, and Jesus may have used this word for that reason, of course. That would be quite in character. But it also seems likely that this intimate term of address for God expressed the intimacy of Jesus’ own experience of God.
29%
Flag icon
Sometimes his sayings began with the word amen rather than ending with it. This initial amen is unusual within Judaism. Such authoritative forms of speaking suggest that he perceived himself as speaking “from the mouth of the Spirit,” and not simply as reciting tradition.37
29%
Flag icon
Jesus was both a healer and an exorcist.
29%
Flag icon
But historically speaking, we can say that Jesus was perceived by his contemporaries and himself as an exorcist who cast demons out of people and as a healer of diseases, and that this was attributed to the power of the Spirit working through him.
29%
Flag icon
All of this makes it plausible to locate Jesus’ own spirituality within what we know of Jewish mysticism in his day.
29%
Flag icon
The more we realize that there was a form of Jewish mysticism in first-century Palestine, the more likely it seems that Jesus stood in that experiential tradition.
29%
Flag icon
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me.”40
29%
Flag icon
At the center of Jesus’ life was a profound and continuous relationship to the Spirit of God.
29%
Flag icon
The sketch of Jesus as a spirit person suggests that Jesus was not simply a person who believed strongly in God, but one who knew God.
29%
Flag icon
The image I have sketched views Jesus differently: rather than being the exclusive revelation of God, he is one of many mediators of the sacred.
29%
Flag icon
What are the chances that God would speak only to and through this particular group of people (who just happened to be our group of people)?
29%
Flag icon
However, I find the image of Jesus as a spirit person highly credible.
30%
Flag icon
There really are experiences of the sacred, of the numinous, of God–and Jesus was one for whom God...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
30%
Flag icon
Candor compels me to acknowledge that experiences of the sacred do not prove the reality of God (though I find them far more interesting and convincing than any of the “proofs” for the existence of God). But if one does take these experiences as epiphanies of the way things are, as disclosures of the sacred–as I do myself–they have implications for how we think of God.
30%
Flag icon
The supernaturalist way of imaging God also sees God as a being “out there,” and differs from deism only by affirming that God from time to time supernaturally intervenes in this world (especially in the events reported in the Old and New Testaments).
30%
Flag icon
“the god of theism,” which images God as a being separate from the world–that is,
30%
Flag icon
And both typically stress belief as the basis for affirming the existence of a God who is essentially not around.
30%
Flag icon
Rather than being an article of belief, God becomes an experiential reality.
30%
Flag icon
The experience of spirit persons in general and of Jesus in particular suggests that God is not to be thought of as a remote and transcendent creator far removed from this world, but imaged as all around us–as “the one in whom we live and move and have our being,” as the book of Acts puts it in words attributed to Saint Paul.
30%
Flag icon
It shifts the focus of the Christian life from believing in Jesus or believing in God to being in relationship to the same Spirit that Jesus knew.
30%
Flag icon
the Christian life moves beyond believing in God to being in relationship to God.
33%
Flag icon
Spirit is synonymous with God, so long as God is understood as an experiential reality and not as a distant being.
35%
Flag icon
Spirit and compassion.
35%
Flag icon
Jesus’ advocacy of compassion continues to be an invitation and a challenge to the church in our day.
35%
Flag icon
For Jesus, compassion was the central quality of God and the central moral quality of a life centered in God.
35%
Flag icon
Jesus’ message speaks of a way of life grounded in an imitatio dei–an imitation of God. Image of God and ethos–what God is like and how we are to live–are brought together.
35%
Flag icon
Compassion thus means feeling the feelings of somebody else in a visceral way, at a level somewhere below the level of the head; most commonly compassion is associated with feeling the suffering of somebody else and being moved by that suffering to do something. That is, the feeling of compassion leads to being compassionate.
35%
Flag icon
Hebrew words for compassion and compassionate are
36%
Flag icon
To paraphrase William Blake, mercy wears a human face, and compassion a human heart.
36%
Flag icon
so Jesus’ statement “Be compassionate as God is compassionate” is rooted in the Jewish tradition.
36%
Flag icon
Like a womb, God is the one who gives birth to us–the mother who gives birth to us.
36%
Flag icon
As a mother loves the children of her womb and feels for the children of her womb, so God loves us and feels for us, for all of her children.
36%
Flag icon
In its sense of “like a womb,” compassionate has nuances of giving life, nourishing, caring, perhaps embracing and encompassing. ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
36%
Flag icon
to complete the imitatio dei, to “be compassionate as God is compassionate” is to be like a womb as God is like a womb. It is to feel as God feels and to act as G...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
36%
Flag icon
According to Jesus, compassion is to be the central quality of a life faithful to God the compassionate one.
36%
Flag icon
“Be holy as God is holy.”10
36%
Flag icon
It is in the conflict between these two imitatio deis–between holiness and compassion as qualities of God to be embodied in community–that we see the central conflict in the ministry of Jesus: between two different social visions. The dominant social vision was centered in holiness; the alternative social vision of Jesus was centered in compassion.
36%
Flag icon
For Jesus, compassion was more than a quality of God and an individual virtue: it was a social paradigm,
36%
Flag icon
To put it boldly: compassion for Jesus was political.
36%
Flag icon
advocated instead what might be called a politics of compassion.
37%
Flag icon
But in first-century Jewish Palestine, this was not the case. Purity was neither trivial nor individualistic. Rather, to put it concisely, purity was political.