Think Like a Rocket Scientist: Simple Strategies You Can Use to Make Giant Leaps in Work and Life
Rate it:
Kindle Notes & Highlights
59%
Flag icon
THE “FAIL FAST, fail often, fail forward” mantra
59%
Flag icon
FailCon,
59%
Flag icon
“Putting the Fun in Funeral.”
60%
Flag icon
A moratorium on failure is a moratorium on progress.
61%
Flag icon
culpability
61%
Flag icon
squidding.
61%
Flag icon
“speckling”
61%
Flag icon
red RTV,
61%
Flag icon
“intelligent failures.”
62%
Flag icon
vanity
62%
Flag icon
“Elon had lost all his money, but this was more than his fortune at stake—it was his credibility.”
62%
Flag icon
To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, there’s a difference between a single failure and final defeat.34 A single failure, as SpaceX’s story illustrates, can be the beginning, not the end.
63%
Flag icon
The opening doesn’t have to be grand, as long as the finale is.
63%
Flag icon
Breakthroughs are often evolutionary, not revolutionary.
63%
Flag icon
Science weaves from failure to failure, with each version better than the one that came before. From a scientific perspective, failure isn’t a roadblock. It’s a portal to progress.
63%
Flag icon
If we ask a better question than the ones asked before, that’s a contribution, even if the answers elude us.
63%
Flag icon
Focusing on outputs leads us astray because good decisions can lead to bad outcomes. In conditions of uncertainty, outcomes aren’t completely within your control.
63%
Flag icon
If we engage in resulting, we reward bad decisions that lead to good outcomes. Conversely, we change good decisions merely because they produced a bad outcome.
63%
Flag icon
The goal, then, is to focus on the variables you can control—the inputs—instead of the outputs. You should ask, “What went wrong with this failure?” and if the inputs need fixing, you should fix them. But this question isn’t enough. You must also ask, “What went right with this failure?” You should retain the good-quality decisions, even if they produced a failure.
64%
Flag icon
Watch the ball as long as you can, Sharapova cautions, and zero in on the inputs. By taking the pressure off the outcome, you get better at your craft. Success becomes a consequence, not the goal.
64%
Flag icon
“What would you do even if you knew that you might very well fail? What do you love doing so much that the words failure and success essentially become irrelevant?”
64%
Flag icon
cringe.
64%
Flag icon
Every time you make a mistake, every time you fail at something, you should throw your arms in the air and say, “How fascinating!”51
64%
Flag icon
petulant
65%
Flag icon
Better teams were making more mistakes, not less.
65%
Flag icon
better teams weren’t making more mistakes. Instead, they were simply reporting more mistakes. The teams that had a climate of openness—where the staff felt safe to discuss mistakes—performed better because employees were more willing to share failures and actively work to reduce them.
65%
Flag icon
Psychological safety means, in Edmondson’s words, “no one will be punished or humiliated for errors, questions, or requests for help, in the service of reaching ambitious performance goals.”
66%
Flag icon
The worst-performing teams—those that were in most need of improvement—were also the least likely to report errors.
66%
Flag icon
Reward excellent failures, punish mediocre successes,”
66%
Flag icon
must be a clear commitment to supporting intelligent failure and well-intentioned risk taking. People must know that intelligent failure is necessary for future success, that they won’t be punished for it, and that their careers won’t be ended for it.
66%
Flag icon
blunders,
66%
Flag icon
This is why I started the “Famous Failures” podcast,
66%
Flag icon
one caveat. You must establish your competence before revealing your failures. Otherwise, you risk damaging your credibility and coming across as a mess—and not a beautiful one.76
67%
Flag icon
balmy
69%
Flag icon
As Bill Gates says, success is “a lousy teacher” because it “seduces smart people into thinking they can’t lose.”
70%
Flag icon
participants against each other in a typing contest involving two periods separated by a short break.38 During the break, participants were told they were either far behind (−50 points), slightly behind (−1 point), tied, or slightly ahead (+1 point). The participants who believed they were slightly behind exerted significantly more effort than all the other participants in the second period.
71%
Flag icon
portend
71%
Flag icon
masquerade
71%
Flag icon
Near misses lead people to take unwise risks. Rather than urgency, near misses create complacency.
71%
Flag icon
egregious
72%
Flag icon
The next time you’re tempted to start basking in the glory of your success while admiring the scoreboard, stop and pause for a moment. Ask yourself, What went wrong with this success? What role did luck, opportunity, and privilege play? What can I learn from it? If we don’t ask these questions, luck will eventually run its course, and the near misses will catch up with us.
72%
Flag icon
warts
73%
Flag icon
The Premortem
73%
Flag icon
“I wish I knew where I was going to die, and then I’d never go there.”60 This approach is called a premortem.
73%
Flag icon
Backcasting works backward from a desired outcome. A premortem works backward from an undesired outcome. It forces you to think about what could go wrong before you act.
Erhan
FMEA: Failure Mode Efficacy Analysis
74%
Flag icon
I’m not a morning person. To me, sunrises feel as energizing as a root canal.
74%
Flag icon
risk homeostasis.
Erhan
Moral hazard is another name.
75%
Flag icon
trod
76%
Flag icon
wither.
76%
Flag icon
When success brings complacency