Why We're Polarized
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between December 8, 2024 - January 29, 2025
37%
Flag icon
The problem, she admits, is “we can’t say, ‘Don’t worry, white people, you’ll be okay and you’ll get to run everything forever!’ ”
Charles
Again it's racially motivated, no mention of policies.
37%
Flag icon
It will absorb even figures who might prefer not to talk much about race.
Charles
God knows that's all you want to talk about.
37%
Flag icon
In the 2020 primary, however, Sanders endorsed decriminalizing unauthorized border entry and providing public health insurance to unauthorized immigrants.
Charles
Unbelievable.
37%
Flag icon
the browning of America
Charles
Unless you're a racist, it should literally mean nothing.
37%
Flag icon
The human mind is exquisitely tuned to group affiliation and group difference.
Charles
Only if they are taught to be.
37%
Flag icon
we naturally assume ourselves in competition with other groups.
Charles
And who is literally teaching people that?
38%
Flag icon
Obama’s presidency was an example of the younger, more diverse coalition taking power;
Charles
And it's all about power to this guy. Group politics and power they have.
38%
Flag icon
explanatory news organization Vox,
Charles
Leftist propaganda rag.
39%
Flag icon
lot of us really do want to improve the functioning of democracy—but
Charles
To him that means "control other people."
40%
Flag icon
And, obviously, my views on those questions are rational, judicious, disinterested, and objectively correct.
Charles
I assume he's joking. He doesn't believe in objective reality, and does not know how to be rational.
40%
Flag icon
Democrats believed 44 percent of Republicans earned over $250,000 a year; it’s actually 2 percent.
Charles
They've been soaked in Marxist ideas of class-warfare.
40%
Flag icon
Republicans believed that 38 percent of Democrats were gay, lesbian, or bisexual; the correct answer is about 6 percent.
Charles
14% in 2024
41%
Flag icon
To post that article on Facebook is to make a statement about who you are, who your group is, and, just as important, who is excluded.
Charles
Or maybe you just found it interesting?
41%
Flag icon
They spit back an expression of your personality, alongside the group you belong to,
Charles
Or maybe they express something that distinguishes you from others, rather than grouping with them? Ever think of that, collectivist-boy?
42%
Flag icon
In the absence of social media and audience analytics, I doubt that newsrooms run by white men would’ve devoted blanket coverage to the events in Ferguson, Missouri, and their aftermath.
Charles
Right, because you're a racist.
42%
Flag icon
When I was in high school, I began smoking pot.
Charles
There's a shocker.
45%
Flag icon
over a viral video in which students from Covington Catholic High School wearing MAGA hats appeared to harass Nathan Phillips, a Native American elder playing a drum.
Charles
He harrassed them!
50%
Flag icon
Institutional donors are corrupting.
Charles
No, they've been corrupted by a gov't with too much power, which extorts them and takes bribes.
53%
Flag icon
The Garland affair remains an open wound to liberals, an example of how Republicans will stop at nothing to gain and retain power.
Charles
As if the same can't be said about Dems.
54%
Flag icon
paralysis in Congress are making the Court’s judgments more consequential, as when the Court throws out a bill or invalidates a program; legislators rarely have the bipartisan consensus or partisan power to revisit the legislation and answer the Court through modifications.
Charles
If only Congress were truly paralyzed!
60%
Flag icon
What they find is that the Democratic Party is a diverse collection of interest groups held together by policy goals, while the Republican Party is built atop a more united base that finds commonality in more abstract, ideological commitments.
Charles
Gee, how insightful.
61%
Flag icon
long-standing media organizations steeped in the traditions and practices of objective journalism.
Charles
That's hilarious. lol
61%
Flag icon
Conservatives protest that the media is liberally biased, so they had no choice but to build their alternative network.
Charles
And that is true.
62%
Flag icon
The New York Times and ABC News fear a liberal reputation—they want to be understood as neutral arbiters of truth—and reporting oppositionally and inconveniently on the Democratic Party is both part of the self-identity and the business model.
Charles
Ridiculous.
62%
Flag icon
because the mainstream media and academia actually aren’t that liberal, because they mostly do put truth-seeking ahead of partisanship,
Charles
What a joke.
62%
Flag icon
Democrats rely on a diversity of information sources that discipline their flights of fancy,
Charles
Laughable notion.
62%
Flag icon
Republicans rely on a narrower set of media institutions that propel their polarization.
Charles
True enough.
62%
Flag icon
If America was a democracy, Democrats would control the House, the Senate, the White House, and, through those victories, a commanding majority on the Supreme Court. Their weakness is the result of geography, not popularity.
Charles
Thank the Founders it's not a Democracy !
64%
Flag icon
America, he said, was built atop the insight that “free government was only suitable and sustainable for a religious people.”
Charles
Nonsense.
65%
Flag icon
America’s modern run of polarization has its roots in the civil rights era, in the Democratic Party choosing to embrace racial equality and the Republican Party providing a home to white backlash.
Charles
lol Oh really? Again it's all about race with this guy.
65%
Flag icon
at less cost to the American people and the services they depend on.
Charles
His main cncern no doubt.
65%
Flag icon
as the unemployment rate rises, the federal government can automatically absorb more state Medicaid costs, boost unemployment and food stamp spending, and begin lowering payroll taxes or expanding Social Security checks.
Charles
And there it is.
65%
Flag icon
At the presidential level, it would simply mean doing away with the archaic electoral college.
Charles
lol Of course.
66%
Flag icon
the National Interstate Popular Vote Compact is an agreement by states to throw their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the popular vote. It would take legal force the moment states representing a 270-vote majority in the electoral college sign it—and so far, the states that have joined represent 196 electoral votes, which is more than 70 percent of the way there.
Charles
Ironically, they want to overthrow the will of their own voters in the name of "democracy." So retarded.
66%
Flag icon
But they’re not. What they know is that their roads aren’t getting fixed, their jobs aren’t coming back, and Washington doesn’t seem to be doing anything to help them.
Charles
And that's what he thinks gov't is for, of course.
66%
Flag icon
I choose governance, in part because I trust the American people to ultimately look out for their own interests.
Charles
Statist fool.
66%
Flag icon
There is no less dysfunctional politics without a less dysfunctional GOP, and the path to a less dysfunctional GOP is forcing the party to reach beyond the ethnonationalist coalition Trump rode to victory.
Charles
This guy is literally blind to the idea of principled thought.
67%
Flag icon
Non-Hispanic Whites.”
Charles
Who declared Hispanics to be whites?
67%
Flag icon
The threat to the United States of America has always been disunity.
Charles
Enforce the Constitution and it wouldn't matter.
67%
Flag icon
Epps and Sitaraman suggest rebuilding the Supreme Court so it has fifteen justices: each party gets to appoint five, and then the ten partisan justices must unanimously appoint the remaining five. Until all fifteen are agreed upon, the Court wouldn’t be able to hear cases.
Charles
Preposterous.
68%
Flag icon
The point of this book is that we all inhabit a larger context that shapes our actions.
Charles
Collectivism.
68%
Flag icon
Once we recognize that we exist amid an omnipresent conspiracy to manipulate our identities, we can begin the hard work of fashioning our environment to shape and strengthen the identities we want to inhabit.
Charles
Is that his version of "think independently?"
68%
Flag icon
My point is not that we should all go informationally Galt.
Charles
A Rand reference from this guy. So inappropriate.
69%
Flag icon
The search for a static answer will always be folly.
Charles
Not so.
69%
Flag icon
There is no one best way for the system to work.
Charles
Wrong again.
69%
Flag icon
If I’ve done my job well, this book will offer a model that helps make sense of an era in American politics that can seem senseless.”
Charles
Utter fail.
69%
Flag icon
insurrection,
Charles
lol
69%
Flag icon
mused about injecting Americans with bleach,
Charles
And this guy thinks he's a journalist. Pathetic.
70%
Flag icon
“We are so locked into our political identities that there is virtually no candidate, no information, no condition, that can force us to change our minds.
Charles
Again, he seems to not grasp the idea of self-initiated autonomous individual thought.
70%
Flag icon
I’d written at length about the way Republicans had radicalized further and faster than the Democrats.
Charles
Ha! Such crap. Antifa. BLM. Woke. Left, Left, Left.
« Prev 1 2 Next »