The Precipice: ‘A book that seems made for the present moment’ New Yorker
Rate it:
11%
Flag icon
Albert Einstein
11%
Flag icon
Jonathan Schell,
11%
Flag icon
Carl Sagan
11%
Flag icon
Derek ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
12%
Flag icon
John Leslie,
12%
Flag icon
Nick Bostrom
12%
Flag icon
Existential risk still seems new and strange, but I am hopeful that it will soon find its way into our common moral traditions.
12%
Flag icon
Environmentalism
12%
Flag icon
to establish the pivotal importance of safeguarding humanity, and to place this among the pantheon of causes to which the world devotes substantial attention and resources.
13%
Flag icon
think seriously about imprecise probabilities of unprecedented events
17%
Flag icon
there was a serious subjective risk that their bomb might destroy humanity.
17%
Flag icon
1954
17%
Flag icon
Instead of six megatons they got 15—
18%
Flag icon
Nuclear winter
19%
Flag icon
runaway greenhouse effect
21%
Flag icon
Paul Ehrlich,
21%
Flag icon
Ehrlich’s book, The Population Bomb,
21%
Flag icon
Green Revolution,
21%
Flag icon
Norman Borlaug,
21%
Flag icon
who may be responsible for saving more lives than anyone else in history.
27%
Flag icon
we would cede our status as the most intelligent entities on Earth.
27%
Flag icon
we might hope to retain control.
27%
Flag icon
reward function.
27%
Flag icon
the AI system could gain access to the internet and hide thousands of backup copies,
29%
Flag icon
evolution optimising us towards the spreading of our genes, regardless of the effects on what we value.
29%
Flag icon
a locked-in
29%
Flag icon
in dystopia
30%
Flag icon
minimising lock-in.
30%
Flag icon
preserving our options.
30%
Flag icon
preserving our longterm potential—
30%
Flag icon
nanotechnology.
30%
Flag icon
soil samples
30%
Flag icon
alien civilisation.
30%
Flag icon
radical scientific experiments—
30%
Flag icon
Since humanity’s power is still rapidly growing, we shouldn’t be surprised if some of these novel threats pose a substantial amount of risk.
30%
Flag icon
Unforeseen risks are thus important to understanding the relative value of broad versus narrowly targeted efforts.
30%
Flag icon
we may have a chance of stumbling across something that offers the destructive power of the atomic bomb
32%
Flag icon
The 20 percent risk would actually be 2.25 times as important as the 10 percent risk,
33%
Flag icon
the threat of great-power war may (indirectly) pose a significant amount of existential risk.
33%
Flag icon
‘risk factor’,
33%
Flag icon
consider stressors for humanity or for our ability to make good decisions.
33%
Flag icon
These include global economic stagnation, environmental collapse and breakdown in the international order.
33%
Flag icon
We can call the difference between Pr(X|f = fsq) and Pr(X|f = fmin) the contribution that F makes to existential risk.
33%
Flag icon
Similarly, we could call the difference between Pr(X|f = fsq) and Pr(X|f = fmax) the potential of F.
33%
Flag icon
security factors.
33%
Flag icon
Things such as education, peace or prosperity may help protect us.
34%
Flag icon
the more a problem is important, tractable or neglected, the more cost-effective it is to work on it,
34%
Flag icon
Cost-Effectiveness = Importance × Tractability × Neglectedness
34%
Flag icon
(fit and leverage)
34%
Flag icon
soon, sudden and sharp.