No Self, No Problem: How Neuropsychology Is Catching Up to Buddhism
Rate it:
Open Preview
5%
Flag icon
Zen Buddhism offers us the saying, “No thought, no problem.”
7%
Flag icon
For now, the essence of this idea is captured brilliantly by Taoist philosopher and author Wei Wu Wei when he writes, “Why are you unhappy? Because 99.9 percent of everything you think, and of everything you do, is for yourself—and there isn't one.”2
10%
Flag icon
Gazzaniga determined that the left side of the brain created explanations and reasons to help make sense of what was going on.
12%
Flag icon
Ramachandran found that the left brain's role is one of beliefs and interpretation and that it had little regard for reality in making up its interpretations.
15%
Flag icon
These studies strongly suggest that we live our lives under the direction of the interpreter, and for most of us the mind is a master we are not even aware of. We may become angry, offended, sexually aroused, happy, or fearful, and we do not question the authenticity of these thoughts and experiences.
35%
Flag icon
The tendency of the self to defend its own image through more thinking is a hallmark of understanding in Buddhism. Experienced meditators describe how in meditation, as the mind begins to still and the voice in the head speaks less frequently, there is often a rush of thoughts that are most important to sustaining the self-image. This is how meditators can notice what mental stories and thought patterns are their most prevalent preoccupations, as the mind reverts to replaying these topics as a defense against slowing down.
36%
Flag icon
From a neuropsychological perspective, we could say that all of these defenses are caused by the left brain's mechanism readjusting to unexpected pattern changes. From a Buddhist perspective, we could say that the self is recreating itself in response to the threat of dissolution. In my view, they are one and the same.
38%
Flag icon
To be clear, saying the self is an illusion doesn't mean that it doesn't exist at all, but rather that it's akin to a mirage in the middle of the desert. The vision of the oasis is real, but the oasis itself isn't. In this same way, the image of the self is real, but when we look at the image, we find it is simply that, an image and nothing more. The image of both, the oasis and the self, is really just another idea or thought and only there the moment it is being thought of.