because Vitalik had three votes, versus their three votes, plus a tiebreaker vote. They started to become concerned that if they ever saw something they disagreed with, they’d effectively have no way to change it, and they would still be held personally liable. Vitalik explained that past developments within the foundation had persuaded him to structure governance that way. Lars understood that Ethereum was Vitalik’s brainchild and that he didn’t want to risk the foundation to be steered in a direction he disagreed with. Still, he didn’t feel it was right to remain on the board if there was
...more
