Have we not seen in psychiatry, especially in the last few decades, that mental disorders that were hitherto classified as incurable could at least be alleviated, if not completely cured, by some kind of treatment? So who can say whether the particular case of the disorder we are now dealing with would be influenced by such a treatment, by a therapy that is currently being worked on somewhere in the world, in some hospital, without us having any idea of it?
Why does menta illness or disability need to be cure or that to be cured has to be the final goal? Surely not everything different must be considered negative, only because it doesn't fit with society or society's idea of "usefulness". Bust still what is different, what doesn't conform with society its often definedas a disability or illness, when actually it isn't. Take for example autism, learning difficulties or down syndrome, people with the right support can still live meaningful and independent lifes. only because someone does't have the means to fit in the larger group composing society does not take away from them. If the skills of these people were to be helped it would probly show sides of excellece highe than someone who doesn't have thar disability. I have often noticed for example the higher level of sensitivity and emotional undertanding and communication of people with autism, when supposedly they have issues on the emotional and attention sphere. Only because the processing is different does't mean that it is not there or inferior.
