Roozbeh Daneshvar

47%
Flag icon
We’ve evolved to jump to probabilistic conclusions that give us the greatest chance of survival, not the most accurate result. In my imaginary cartoon version of human evolution, the false positives of assuming there is a danger when there isn’t are usually not punished as severely as when a human underestimates a risk and gets eaten. The selection pressure is not on accuracy. Wrong and alive is evolutionarily better than correct and dead.
Humble Pi: When Math Goes Wrong in the Real World
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview