Siege: Trump Under Fire
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between July 21 - August 9, 2019
32%
Flag icon
“It appears likely,” the special counsel’s research on the topic concluded, “that the president can pardon his family members or close associates even for the purpose of impeding an investigation.” When tested, courts have held that the president’s pardon power “is plenary and absolute, with few exceptions.” And it appeared that, in fact, the president could probably pardon himself.
33%
Flag icon
For one thing, the pardon power applies only to federal law, meaning that any state charges were excepted. For another, the power excludes anything to do with impeachment.
33%
Flag icon
Second, the special counsel’s research fastened on a 1974 Supreme Court case. Schick v. Reed, while supporting the broad pardoning power, added a qualification: exercise of the power is legitimate if it “does not otherwise offend the Constitution.”
33%
Flag icon
But the fact that it was given serious consideration suggested that challenging a president for a self-serving pardon wasn’t outside the realm of possibility.
35%
Flag icon
Consequently, the development of a coherent and considered piece of thinking about anything other than the boss’s need to be reassured—however much of a no-win game that might be—was never going to happen.
35%
Flag icon
It was an easy bond: many of Trump’s big-money supporters admired most of Trump’s policies, but almost all disliked Trump himself.
35%
Flag icon
Bannon was convinced that Trump had to be on the ballot in each race. Politicians and operatives are often accused of always running the last race they had won, and for Bannon it was 2016 all over again.
35%
Flag icon
As it was for Bannon, it was for them: Trump was the unaccountable, confounding, vastly annoying, but all-important centerpiece of their lives. Trump was their obsession. He ate at them.
36%
Flag icon
Lewandowski was known for a volatile temper, an attention-deficit problem, and his desperation for a job.
36%
Flag icon
Nunberg was frequently the connective tissue between Trump rumors and Trump news.
36%
Flag icon
“I think of Maggie Haberman”—the New York Times reporter covering Trump—“the way I think of my grandmother,” said Nunberg. “I always go running to her.”
36%
Flag icon
Mightily hurt—once again mightily hurt—he took solace in a weekend of cocaine and
36%
Flag icon
prostitutes. On Monday morning, sleepless and high, he decided to refuse to show up for his grand jury appointment.
36%
Flag icon
In 1998, Monica Lewinsky’s lawyer William H. Ginsburg appeared on all five of the Sunday morning talk shows on the same day. This became known as the “full Ginsburg.”
36%
Flag icon
“Everybody said, ‘You can’t hire this guy, he got all coked up and went on eleven shows,’” said Bannon. “But how could I not hire him? He spent the weekend doing blow off a bunch of girls’ asses and then got up and did eleven
36%
Flag icon
shows. It’s all in the quality of the fuck you, and this was pretty high-quality fuck you.”
36%
Flag icon
He couldn’t execute, to say the least. Trump was merely a symbol, though, as it happened, an extraordinarily powerful one. Hence, the necessity of Steve Bannon.
37%
Flag icon
But the Chinese saw opportunity: during the meeting in April 2017 at Mar-a-Lago between Trump and President Xi—a meeting shepherded by Kissinger and Kushner—they had been amazed at Trump’s openness, capriciousness, and lack of basic information.
37%
Flag icon
In Trump’s Washington it was possible to avoid the State Department, the foreign policy establishment, the intelligence community, and virtually every other normal diplomatic process or restraint.
38%
Flag icon
Kushner’s personal wealth depended on a shaky business whose precarious financial foundation rested on less-than-creditworthy loans. These were the kinds of loans secured through personal relationships and, not unusually, the trading of favors and influence. Often, they were obtained from countries with lax regulatory rules.
38%
Flag icon
JASTA, the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which was expressly written to make it possible for 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia. If Aramco were listed on a foreign exchange, it would be particularly vulnerable to anyone taking advantage of the opening provided by JASTA; in fact, Aramco’s liability would be virtually unlimited. Hence, who would invest?
39%
Flag icon
Now, in the White House, Kushner was told that there was good reason to believe Deng was a spy for the Chinese. She was, Kushner was informed, regularly supplying information gleaned from her social and political contacts to Chinese officials and business figures.
39%
Flag icon
financial era’s most successful global tycoons, Wu had built Anbang from a company with an annual turnover of a few million dollars to one with $300 billion in assets in just ten years.
39%
Flag icon
In June, the Chinese government removed Wu from the company and later sentenced him to prison on financial corruption charges.
39%
Flag icon
The Kushner family’s desperate need for cash was turning U.S. foreign policy into an investment banking scheme dedicated to the refinancing of the Kushner family debt.
40%
Flag icon
In addition to reviewing the Anbang deal, prosecutors were taking a close look at a $285 million 2016 Deutsche Bank loan to Kushner and his father, and at a direct pitch for a bailout made to the Qatar minister of finance in 2017.
40%
Flag icon
For Kushner, the long game was the 2020 campaign. He was convinced the Republicans would lose the House in November 2018; so be it. But no matter who became the Democratic nominee in 2020, it would likely be a very close electoral race. That prospect could prove to be an advantage during the campaign: tight numbers would keep the party in line. As long as the Republican Party held, they could block the Democratic venom. And with a majority in the Senate, impeachment was a toothless threat.
40%
Flag icon
He was childlike—a hyperactive child at that. There was no clear reason for why something caught his interest, nor was there any way to predict his reaction or modulate his response to it.
40%
Flag icon
The key to managing his father-in-law—as everyone in Trump’s family, in the Trump Organization, on The Apprentice, and now in the White House understood—was distraction.
41%
Flag icon
Bannon concluded that the Chinese client state would provide Trump with a great public relations opportunity, but this would also give China more leverage. After negotiating a flimsy handshake deal with Kim, Trump would be beholden to the Chinese, whom he would need to make the North Koreans deliver on their promises, such as they were.
41%
Flag icon
Trump was promising “denuclearization,” while the White House and foreign policy people trailed behind him and tried to clarify a nonexistent process for achieving this end, as well as the terms for this sometime-in-the-future denuclearization status.
42%
Flag icon
Captain Queeg.
42%
Flag icon
sine qua non,
42%
Flag icon
Privately, or not so privately, Bannon believed that Trump, if he made it through his first term, would have had quite enough of the presidency by 2020. “Dude, look at him,” said Bannon, who didn’t look all that good himself.
42%
Flag icon
“He may own every shitty piece of real estate in America,” said Ailes, fondly. Bannon, never one to miss the obvious joke, wondered, “How many illegals live in Hannity’s rentals?”
42%
Flag icon
“I’m sorry, I’m sorry. But, hey, wait a minute. Do you like our life? Well, we owe that all to Mr. Ailes. So I’m staying until his funeral is done.”
46%
Flag icon
NATO, Trump kept repeating to various people accompanying him, “bores the shit out of me.”
46%
Flag icon
He was almost invariably enthusiastic about one-on-one world leader meetings—no matter the subject, no matter the leader—and agitated about collective gatherings.
46%
Flag icon
So he reverted to his basic approach: if maximum flattery doesn’t work, if you can’t get to a deal that way, then “shit on them.”
46%
Flag icon
His stated goal at the summit was to persuade NATO member states to raise their financial contribution.
46%
Flag icon
“Elementary school eloquence. It’s not complicated: he’s been watching Lou Dobbs for thirty years. It’s the only show he watches from beginning to end.”
46%
Flag icon
With respect to policy, he could not get beyond his single point, the one element that overrode all others and stuck in his head: Europeans should pay more.
46%
Flag icon
to Trump, Bannon was confident that Trump was listening to absolutely everything he had to say. In this way, Bannon could reasonably represent, or deftly imply, to his clients that, truly, he had Trump’s ear.
47%
Flag icon
Still, if Bannon was rating Italy as his great success and seeing the grim figure of Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, whose ear he had, as a rising power, this was only a start.
47%
Flag icon
Putin. For several years now, the Russians had been underwriting the Le Pens and their party.
47%
Flag icon
His goal now was to pay the Russians back for their $13 million loan to the Front National (rebranded in mid-2018 as the National Rally) and replace the party’s debt holdings with a more acceptable supporter.
47%
Flag icon
Trump’s ambassador to the Court of St. James’s, Johnson was the Johnson & Johnson heir and owner of the New York Jets and much-mocked socialite and party boy in New York. (“Don’t get me started,” said Bannon. “In a long list of the unqualified, here you have the least qualified.”)
48%
Flag icon
On British defense spending: it ought to be doubled. Immigration to Europe was “a shame—it changed the fabric of Europe.” And “it was never going to be what it was—and I don’t mean that in a positive way … I think you’re losing your culture.” On the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, the highest Muslim officeholder in the UK: “He’s done a terrible job.
48%
Flag icon
It had been a difficult struggle for May and Downing Street to fill the room with top-level British politicians and businessmen, most, as it happened, skeptical about the advantages of close proximity to Trump.
48%
Flag icon
Power, via expertise, had passed to a select group—the Davos gang. In Bannon’s view, this group self-dealt at a historic level of wealth appropriation. It controlled the intellectual, economic, and diplomatic establishment.