Thus, random changes in sequence consistently degrade function or meaning. Indeed, no computer programmer wants random changes introduced into a program that he or she has written. Such changes will inevitably degrade and ultimately destroy the function of the existing program long before a new program would emerge through such a process. As Eden explained, “No currently existing formal language can tolerate random changes in the symbol sequences which express its sentences.
This argument is Fucking Garbage! We do not run software millions of times with random bugs and let them compete for rewards. Experiments where do are promising. Ask Kasparov.
