Mikko Saarinen

62%
Flag icon
When Clinton made public comments critical of the conduct of the Duma elections—consistent in tone and substance with what we would have said in similar circumstances anyplace in the world—Putin lashed out, accusing her of sending the “signal” that drew demonstrators into the streets, and the State Department of quietly supporting opposition parties. Putin had a remarkable capacity for storing up grievances and slights and assembling them to fit his narrative of the West trying to keep Russia down. Clinton’s criticism would rank high in his litany—and generate a personal animus that led ...more
The Back Channel: A Memoir of American Diplomacy and the Case for Its Renewal
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview