It could not, without refuting itself, conclude that natural selection drives true perceptions to extinction. For then the very language of space, time, and physical objects would be the wrong language to describe objective reality. Our scientific observations of physical objects in spacetime, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins, would not be veridical descriptions of objective reality, even if these observations use advanced technologies, such as X-ray diffractometers and electron microscopes. The theory of evolution would refute itself by discrediting its own key assumptions—the logical
...more
Truth means what we see is real and there even when we are not looking. If natural selection favors fitness and drives truth to extinctio then truth was never real. Aka dna which is what evolution is based off of.
