The Founding Myth: Why Christian Nationalism Is Un-American
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between May 24, 2019 - January 24, 2021
27%
Flag icon
The Puritans imposed the death penalty for worshipping other gods, blasphemy, homosexuality, and adultery.
27%
Flag icon
That is what a Christian government looks like: exclusive, exclusionary, divisive, hateful, severe, and lethal. It resembles modern theocracies in the Middle East.
27%
Flag icon
In the first of The Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton wrote, “For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution.”
27%
Flag icon
When our nation was founded, it rejected the intolerance theocracy breeds.
27%
Flag icon
PART II
27%
Flag icon
UNITED STATES v. THE BIBLE
27%
Flag icon
6
27%
Flag icon
Biblical Influence
27%
Flag icon
Using biblical stories to communicate an idea does not necessarily indicate that biblical theology influenced the underlying idea or that the speaker adheres to a biblical religion.
28%
Flag icon
Those two points aside, we know that the modern idea of separation of powers did not come from the bible. It came from Montesquieu, who never mentioned or referred to the bible in his discussion of three separate branches of government.
28%
Flag icon
Christianity’s view and treatment of its founding documents is at odds with the American view and treatment of its founding documents. God’s law is unchangeable. American law is not.
28%
Flag icon
The Constitution has been altered twenty-seven times and nearly always improved. The glaring exception to this steady improvement was partly due to religious groups, such as the Women’s Christian Temperance Union, which advocated for the Eighteenth Amendment, Prohibition, and which was repealed by the Twenty-first Amendment.
28%
Flag icon
The bible has been edited, rewritten, excised, supplemented, translated, retranslated, and mistranslated so many times that claims of immutability are laughable.
29%
Flag icon
When Lutz examined only the political writings, the writing relevant to the discussion here (about 2,200 documents), the citations to the bible disappeared. The authors cited the bible about 0.3 times on average, or made about one biblical reference in every three or four works.35
29%
Flag icon
In 528 writings published during the formative years of the American Constitution (1787–88), there were thirty-three citations to the bible, or about one in every sixteen publications.
29%
Flag icon
When Lutz separated the Federalists (those arguing for the Constitution and a central, federal government) from the Anti-Federalists (those arguing against the Constitution), he discovered that the Federalists never cited the bible—not once.
29%
Flag icon
It is assumed that our government was founded on biblical principles, on Judeo-Christian principles. Because this answer is assumed, few bother to explain which specific Judeo-Christian principles and ideas were so influential to America’s founding.
29%
Flag icon
Judeo-Christian principles are so irreconcilable that we can fairly say: Judeo-Christianity is un-American.
29%
Flag icon
An Argument Anticipated
29%
Flag icon
Our country is based on clear principles that are attained by reason, not on a text that repeatedly contradicts itself.
29%
Flag icon
7
29%
Flag icon
Christian Arrogance and the Golden Rule
29%
Flag icon
The Jewish formulation of the rule first appears in Leviticus: “You shall not hate in your heart anyone of your kin; you shall reprove your neighbor, or you will incur guilt yourself. You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against any of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.”3
29%
Flag icon
Here, “your kin,” “your people,” and “your neighbor” are used synonymously. So this version of the rule is not universal and applies only to others who worship the same god—not to heretics.
29%
Flag icon
The Golden Rule exists in nearly every society and also appears, in one form or another, in many religions, including “Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Zoroastrianism, and the rest of the world’s major religions,” according to one ethicist.
29%
Flag icon
“Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do.” ~Ancient Egypt (c. 2040–1650 BCE)6
29%
Flag icon
“Don’t do yourself what you disapprove of in others.” ~Pittacus of Mytilene, Ancient Greece (c. 640–568 BCE)7
29%
Flag icon
“Never do ourselves what we blame others for doing.” ~Thales of Miletus, Ancient...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
29%
Flag icon
“To those who are good (to me), I am good; and to those who are not good (to me), I am also good; and thus (all) get to be good.” ~Laozi, China (sixth century BCE)
29%
Flag icon
“Do not impose on others what you do not desire others to impose upon you.” ~Confucius, China (551–479 BCE)
29%
Flag icon
“What I disapprove of in the actions of my neighbor, that—as best I can—I will not do.” ~Herodotus, Ancient Greece (fifth century BCE)
29%
Flag icon
“If people regarded other people’s families in the same way that they regard their own, who then would incite their own family to attack that of another? For one would do for others as one would do for oneself.” ~Mozi, China (c. 470–391 BCE)12
29%
Flag icon
“Do not do to others the things that anger you when you experience them from others.” ~Isocrates, Ancient Greece (c. 436–338 BCE)
29%
Flag icon
“We ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him.” ~Plato/Socrates (fifth–fourth century BCE)
30%
Flag icon
“One should never do that to another which one regards as injurious to one’s own self. This, in brief, is the rule of Righteousness.” ~Hindu Mahabharata (c. fourth century BCE)
30%
Flag icon
Justice is an agreement “neither to harm nor be harmed.” ~Epicurus, Ancient Greece (341–270 BCE)
30%
Flag icon
“What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow: this is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn.” ~Hillel (c. 110 BCE–10 CE)
30%
Flag icon
“Do to others as you would have them do to you.” ~Jesus (c. 30 CE)
30%
Flag icon
The Golden Rule is not a Judeo-Christian principle. It is a universal human principle.
30%
Flag icon
It is often argued that Christians are humble and that atheists and scientists are arrogant. But this is backward. Atheists, scientists, and other rational citizens—and religious citizens in their nonreligious thinking—claim to have answers supported by evidence, not by faith. Christianity claims to know ultimate truths about the universe with absolute certainty because of faith, not evidence. Faith, almost by definition, is conceit.
30%
Flag icon
Arguing that the Golden Rule influenced America’s founding does nothing to prove that we are a Christian nation, but it does help show the arrogance of Christian nationalism.
30%
Flag icon
8
30%
Flag icon
Biblical Obedience or American Freedom?
30%
Flag icon
The founding documents of the United States revere and protect freedom above all else. The bible worships and demands the opposite: obedience, submission, and servility.
30%
Flag icon
If most Americans are religious, they are free to be only because there is no government-endorsed religion that devours religious freedom.
30%
Flag icon
God requires fear and unquestioning obedience to the point of killing your children.
31%
Flag icon
If Christianity is about anything, it is about obedience to god. That’s why the original sin is not genocide, murder, or rape, but eating a piece of fruit after being told not to.
31%
Flag icon
Franklin Roosevelt said, “In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed; it must be achieved.”
31%
Flag icon
At its core, Judeo-Christianity’s insistence on obedience and fear conflicts with America’s essential value.
31%
Flag icon
9
1 5 11